Objective: To determine the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) attenuation properties of meniscal calcifications in calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) in vivo, and assess whether DECT was able to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) in subchondral and trabecular bone. Method: Patients with clinical suspicion of crystal-related arthropathy (gout and/or CPPD) and knee DECT scans were retrospectively assigned to CPPD (n ¼ 19) or control (n ¼ 21) groups depending on the presence/absence of chondrocalcinosis on DECT. Two observers drew standardized regions of interest (ROI) in meniscal calcifications, non-calcified menisci, as well as subchondral and trabecular bone. Five DECT parameters were obtained: CT numbers (HU) at 80 and 140 kV, dual-energy index (DEI), electron density (r e), and effective atomic number (Z eff). The four different knee structures were compared within/between patients and controls using linear mixed models, adjusting for confounders. Results: Meniscal calcifications (n ¼ 89) in CPPD patients had mean ± SD CT numbers at 80 and 140 kV of 257 ± 64 and 201 ± 48 HU, respectively; with a DEI of 0.023 ± 0.007, and r e and Z eff of 140 ± 35 and 8.8 ± 0.3, respectively. Meniscal CPP deposits were readily distinguished from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p 0.001), except at 80 kV separately (p ¼ 0.74). Z eff and r e both significantly differed between CPP deposits and calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study shows that DECT has the potential to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone in vivo, paving the way for the noninvasive biochemical signature assessment of intra-and juxta-articular calcium crystal deposits.

Background: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is being considered as a non-invasive diagnostic and characterization tool in calcium crystal-associated arthropathies. Our objective was to assess the potential of DECT in distinguishing between basic calcium phosphate (BCP) and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal deposition in and around joints in vivo. Methods: A total of 13 patients with calcific periarthritis and 11 patients with crystal-proven CPPD were recruited prospectively to undergo DECT scans. Samples harvested from BCP and CPP calcification types were analyzed using Raman spectroscopy and validated against synthetic crystals. Regions of interest were placed in BCP and CPP calcifications, and the following DECT attenuation parameters were obtained: CT numbers (HU) at 80 and 140 kV, dual-energy index (DEI), electron density (Rho), and effective atomic number ( Zeff). These DECT attenuation parameters were compared and validated against crystal calibration phantoms at two known equal concentrations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the highest accuracy thresholds for DEI and Zeff. Results: Raman spectroscopy enabled chemical fingerprinting of BCP and CPP crystals both in vitro and in vivo. DECT was able to distinguish between HA and CPP in crystal calibration phantoms at two known equal concentrations, most notably by DEI (200 mg/cm3: 0.037 ± 0 versus 0.034 ± 0, p = 0.008) and Zeff (200 mg /cm3: 9.4 ± 0 versus 9.3 ± 0, p = 0.01) analysis. Likewise, BCP calcifications had significantly higher DEI (0.041 ± 0.005 versus 0.034 ± 0.005, p = 0.008) and Zeff (9.5 ± 0.2 versus 9.3 ± 0.2, p = 0.03) than CPP crystal deposits with comparable CT numbers in patients. With an area under the ROC curve of 0.83 [best threshold value = 0.0 39, sensitivity = 90. 9% (81.8, 97. 7%), specificity = 64.6% (50.0, 64. 6%)], DEI was the best parameter in distinguishing between BCP and CPP crystal depositions. Conclusion: DECT can help distinguish between crystal-proven BCP and CPP calcification types in vivo and, thus, aid in the diagnosis of challenging clinical cases, and in the characterization of CPP and BCP crystal deposition occurring in osteoarthritis.

BackgroundPredicting the risk of flares in patients with gout is a challenge and the link between urate burden and the risk of gout flare is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if the extent of monosodium urate (MSU) burden measured with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and ultrasonography (US) is predictive of the risk of gout flares.MethodsThis prospective observational study recruited patients with gout to undergo MSU burden assessment with DECT (volume of deposits) and US (double contour sign) scans of the knees and feet. Patients attended follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patients having presented with at least one flare at 6 months were compared to those who did not flare. Odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval) for the risk of flare were calculated.ResultsOverall, 64/78 patients included attended at least one follow-up visit. In bivariate analysis, the number of joints with the double contour sign was not associated with the risk of flare (p = 0.67). Multivariate analysis retained a unique variable: DECT MSU volume of the feet. For each 1 cm3 increase in DECT MSU volume in foot deposits, the risk of flare increased 2.03-fold during the first 6 months after initial assessment (OR 2.03 (1.15–4.38)). The threshold volume best discriminating patients with and without flare was 0.81 cm3 (specificity 61%, sensitivity 77%).ConclusionsThis is the first study showing that the extent of MSU burden measured with DECT but not US is predictive of the risk of flares.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1714-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.