The authors examine the prevalence of acute traumatic dissociative responses in a group of 115 law enforcement officers involved in critical incidents. Law enforcement officers were retrospectively surveyed for the presence of dissociative symptoms at the time of the critical incident, as well as for the presence of acute stress symptoms and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Results show that 90% of the officers reported experiencing a dissociative response during the critical incident. Thirty percent meet the Dissociative Criterion B of acute stress disorder under the DSM-IV. The mean number of dissociative symptoms in this group was two and one-half. In addition, 19% of the law enforcement officers reported varying forms of memory impairment for details of the incident. There were no reports of amnesia for the entire event. The clinical, forensic, and legal implications of these preliminary findings are discussed in this paper.

No abstract

Lactulose has been proposed to be beneficial in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The hypothesis is based on the prebiotic potential of lactulose. A practical approach to testing its usefulness is to determine colonic adaptation to tolerable doses in patients with IBD. Our objective was to determine if a 3-week course of lactulose will decrease BH2 and symptoms in response to an acute lactulose challenge test in control subjects and IBD patients. The design was a prospective cohort study. Subjects were given a 30-g lactulose challenge test (test 1), and then ingested 10 g of lactulose twice a day for 3 weeks before being retested (Test 2). A third test was given after a further 5-week washout period. The main outcomes were the change in 4-hr sum of BH2 (sum(4HrBH2)) values obtained every 30 min, peak BH2, and 4-hr sum of symptom score (sum(4HrSS)) during the lactulose challenge test. In addition, we also report the change in self-reported symptoms and diarrhea during the 3-week administration of lactulose. In controls, sum(4HrBH2) decreased from test 1 (380.5 +/- 56.6 ppm) to test 2 (288.6 +/- 57.4 ppm) (P < 0.05), and returned toward test 1 levels by test 3 (307.5 +/- 53.1, P > 0.5). Unlike controls, the sum(4HrBH2) in patients failed to achieve significance between test 1 (444.5 +/- 55.8 ppm), test 2 (366.5 +/- 80.7 ppm, P > 0.2) or test 3 (411.6 +/- 62.5 ppm, P > 0.2). Sum(4HrSS) results in controls followed a pattern similar to sum(4HrBH2), achieving significance only in test 2 (P < 0.02). Symptoms during the intertest periods decreased by the third week in controls (P < 0.05), but not in patients (P > 0.5). Symptoms were lower in patients and varied insignificantly both in challenges and intertest periods. In conclusion, although controls adapt to a 3-week period of lactulose ingestion, IBD patients fail to meet the criteria for adaptation. However, longer studies may be needed to establish whether IBD patients are slower to adapt.

Lactulose is a disaccharide derived from lactose. There has been recent rekindling of interest in the possible benefits of pro- and prebiotics: mainly, lactic acid-producing bacteria and lactulose for the lower intestine. Since lactose maldigestion is a common genetic trait, we undertook this study to delineate similar effects between these two disaccharides. Nine healthy lactose maldigesting subjects underwent two separate periods of three weeks adaptation, first with 10 g twice daily lactulose and then 1.5 g twice daily lactose (in milk). Adaptation was defined by reduced breath Hydrogen (BH2) and symptoms after 50 g lactose challenges. In six subjects fecal beta-galactosidase was measured. All subjects consumed some lactose daily. In the first period, eight subjects improved symptoms and reduced BH2 significantly, while in the second period they did not. Fecal beta-galactosidase significantly increased after lactulose. This study supports the notion that lactulose and lactose may have similar clinical effects.