During a typical cardiac short scan, the heart can move several millimeters. As a result, the corresponding CT reconstructions may be corrupted by motion artifacts. Especially the assessment of small structures, such as the coronary arteries, is potentially impaired by the presence of these artifacts. In order to estimate and compensate for coronary artery motion, this manuscript proposes the deep partial angle-based motion compensation (Deep PAMoCo). Methods: The basic principle of the Deep PAMoCo relies on the concept of partial angle reconstructions (PARs), that is, it divides the short scan data into several consecutive angular segments and reconstructs them separately. Subsequently, the PARs are deformed according to a motion vector field (MVF) such that they represent the same motion state and summed up to obtain the final motioncompensated reconstruction. However, in contrast to prior work that is based on the same principle, the Deep PAMoCo estimates and applies the MVF via a deep neural network to increase the computational performance as well as the quality of the motion compensated reconstructions. Results: Using simulated data, it could be demonstrated that the Deep PAMoCo is able to remove almost all motion artifacts independent of the contrast, the radius and the motion amplitude of the coronary artery. In any case, the average error of the CT values along the coronary artery is about 25 HU while errors of up to 300 HU can be observed if no correction is applied. Similar results were obtained for clinical cardiac CT scans where the Deep PAMoCo clearly outperforms state-of-the-art coronary artery motion compensation approaches in terms of processing time as well as accuracy. Conclusions: The Deep PAMoCo provides an efficient approach to increase the diagnostic value of cardiac CT scans even if they are highly corrupted by motion.
Purpose Dual‐source computed tomography (DSCT) uses two source‐detector pairs offset by about 90°. In addition to the well‐known forward scatter, a special issue in DSCT is cross‐scattered radiation from X‐ray tube A detected in the detector of system B and vice versa. This effect can lead to artifacts and reduction of the contrast‐to‐noise ratio of the images. The purpose of this work is to present and evaluate different deep learning‐based methods for scatter correction in DSCT. Methods We present different neural network‐based methods for forward and cross‐scatter correction in DSCT. These deep scatter estimation (DSE) methods mainly differ in the input and output information that is provided for training and inference and in whether they operate on two‐dimensional (2D) or on three‐dimensional (3D) data. The networks are trained and validated with scatter distributions obtained by our in‐house Monte Carlo simulation. The simulated geometry is adapted to a realistic clinical setup. Results All DSE approaches reduce scatter‐induced artifacts and lead to superior results than the measurement‐based scatter correction. Forward scatter, under the presence of cross‐scatter, is best estimated either by our network that uses the current projection and a couple of neighboring views (fDSE 2D few views) or by our 3D network that processes all projections simultaneously (fDSE 3D). Cross‐scatter, under the presence of forward scatter, is best estimated using xSSE XDSE 2D, with xSSE referring to a quick single scatter estimate of cross scatter, or by xDSE 3D that uses all projections simultaneously. By using our proposed networks, the total scatter error in dual could be reduced from about 18 HU to approximately 3 HU. Conclusions Deep learning‐based scatter correction can reduce scatter artifacts in DSCT. To achieve more accurate cross‐scatter estimations, the use of a cross‐scatter approximation improves the results. Also, the ability to leverage across different projection angles improves the precision of the algorithm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.