Photoautotrophic organisms, the major agent of inorganic carbon fixation into biomass, convert light energy into chemical energy. The first step of photosynthesis consists of the absorption of solar energy by pigments binding protein complexes named photosystems. Within photosystems, a family of proteins called Light Harvesting Complexes (LHC), responsible for light harvesting and energy transfer to reaction centers, has evolved along with eukaryotic organisms. Besides light absorption, these proteins catalyze photoprotective reactions which allowed functioning of oxygenic photosynthetic machinery in the increasingly oxidant environment. In this work we review current knowledge of LHC proteins serving Photosystem II. Balance between light harvesting and photoprotection is critical in Photosystem II, due to the lower quantum efficiency as compared to Photosystem I. In particular, we focus on the role of each antenna complex in light harvesting, energy transfer, scavenging of reactive oxygen species, chlorophyll triplet quenching and thermal dissipation of excess energy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosystem II.

In oxygenic photosynthetic organisms, chlorophyll triplets are harmful excited states readily reacting with molecular oxygen to yield the reactive oxygen species (ROS) singlet oxygen. Carotenoids have a photoprotective role in photosynthetic membranes by preventing photoxidative damage through quenching of chlorophyll singlets and triplets. In this work we used mutation analysis to investigate the architecture of chlorophyll triplet quenching sites within Lhcb5, a monomeric antenna protein of Photosystem II. The carotenoid and chlorophyll triplet formation as well as the production of ROS molecules were studied in a family of recombinant Lhcb5 proteins either with WT sequence, mutated into individual chlorophyll binding residues or refolded in vitro to bind different xanthophyll complements. We observed a site-specific effect in the efficiency of chlorophyll-carotenoid triplet-triplet energy transfer. Thus chlorophyll (Chl) 602 and 603 appear to be particularly important for triplet-triplet energy transfer to the xanthophyll bound into site L2. Surprisingly, mutation on Chl 612, the chlorophyll with the lower energy associated and in close contact with lutein in site L1, had no effect on quenching chlorophyll triplet excited states. Finally, we present evidence for an indirect role of neoxanthin in chlorophyll triplet quenching and show that quenching of both singlet and triplet states is necessary for minimizing singlet oxygen formation.

Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of excess absorbed light energy is a fundamental process that regulates photosynthetic light harvesting in higher plants. Among several proposed NPQ mechanisms, aggregation-dependent quenching (ADQ) and charge transfer quenching have received the most attention. In vitro spectroscopic features of both mechanisms correlate with very similar signals detected in more intact systems and in vivo, where full NPQ can be observed. A major difference between the models is the proposed quenching site, which is predominantly the major trimeric light-harvesting complex II in ADQ and exclusively monomeric Lhcb proteins in charge transfer quenching. Here, we studied ADQ in both monomeric and trimeric Lhcb proteins, investigating the activities of each antenna subunit and their dependence on zeaxanthin, a major modulator of NPQ in vivo. We found that monomeric Lhcb proteins undergo stronger quenching than light-harvesting complex II during aggregation and that this is enhanced by binding to zeaxanthin, as occurs during NPQ in vivo. Finally, the analysis of Lhcb5 mutants showed that chlorophyll 612 and 613, in close contact with lutein bound at site L1, are important facilitators of ADQ.