No abstract

No abstract

As part of a cooperation between ONERA and NASA, the liner impedance eduction methods developed by the two research centers are compared. The NASA technique relies on an objective function built on acoustic pressure measurements located on the wall opposite the test liner, and the propagation code solves the convected Helmholtz equation in uniform flow using a finite element method that implements a continuous Galerkin discretization. The ONERA method uses an objective function based either on wall acoustic pressure or on acoustic velocity acquired above the liner by Laser Doppler Anemometry, and the propagation code solves the linearized Euler equations by a discontinuous Galerkin discretization. Two acoustic liners are tested in both ONERA and NASA flow ducts and the measured data are treated with the corresponding impedance eduction method. The first liner is a wire mesh facesheet mounted onto a honeycomb core, designed to be linear with respect to incident sound pressure level and to grazing flow velocity. The second one is a conventional, nonlinear, perforate-over-honeycomb single layer liner. Configurations without and with flow are considered. For the nonlinear liner, the comparison of liner impedance educed by NASA and ONERA shows a sensitivity to the experimental conditions, namely to the nature of the source and to the sample width.

No abstract

Due to a new pass-by noise regulation, Vehicle exterior noise will have to be reduced in the coming years. This may be achieved by optimizing underbody and underhood absorption and screening apertures. There is then a need for numerical techniques able to predict sound reduction related to acoustic absorption and transmission loss changes. Through a work supported by ADEME and headed by PSA, energy-based predictive techniques such as Analytical Statistical Energy Analysis (ASEA) and discretized Energy Flow Analysis (DEFA) were tested against the actual physical problem to be solved through a series of benchmarks. Both theories are compared across several simple acoustic problems. It is concluded that both methods do not fit to the initial acoustic optimization requirement due to their intrinsic assumptions that restrict their applicative range. More fitted numerical techniques are now investigated: among new candidates, the Virtual SEA (VSEA) technique that allows the creation of a numerical model of coupled acoustic cavities from the finite element global modes without the serious limitations of ASEA and a matrix approach based on Craigh-Bampton substructuration of the cavities.