Caffeine from dietary sources (mainly coffee, tea and soft drinks) is the most frequently and widely consumed CNS stimulant in the world today. Because of its enormous popularity, the consumption of caffeine is generally thought to be safe and long term caffeine intake may be disregarded as a medical problem. However, it is clear that this compound has many of the features usually associated with a drug of abuse. Furthermore, physicians should be aware of the possible contribution of dietary caffeine to the presenting signs and symptoms of patients. The toxic effects of caffeine are extensions of their pharmacological effects. The most serious caffeine-related CNS effects include seizures and delirium. Other symptoms affecting the cardiovascular system range from moderate increases in heart rate to more severe cardiac arrhythmia. Although tolerance develops to many of the pharmacological effects of caffeine, tolerance may be overwhelmed by the nonlinear accumulation of caffeine when its metabolism becomes saturated. This might occur with high levels of consumption or as the result of a pharmacokinetic interaction between caffeine and over-the-counter or prescription medications. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-inducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 participates in the metabolism of caffeine as well as of a number of clinically important drugs. A number of drugs, including certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (particularly fluvoxamine), antiarrhythmics (mexiletine), antipsychotics (clozapine), psoralens, idrocilamide and phenylpropanolamine, bronchodilators (furafylline and theophylline) and quinolones (enoxacin), have been reported to be potent inhibitors of this isoenzyme. This has important clinical implications, since drugs that are metabolised by, or bind to, the same CYP enzyme have a high potential for pharmacokinetic interactions due to inhibition of drug metabolism. Thus, pharmacokinetic interactions at the CYP1A2 enzyme level may cause toxic effects during concomitant administration of caffeine and certain drugs used for cardiovascular, CNS (an excessive dietary intake of caffeine has also been observed in psychiatric patients), gastrointestinal, infectious, respiratory and skin disorders. Unless a lack of interaction has already been demonstrated for the potentially interacting drug, dietary caffeine intake should be considered when planning, or assessing response to, drug therapy. Some of the reported interactions of caffeine, irrespective of clinical relevance, might inadvertently cause athletes to exceed the urinary caffeine concentration limit set by sports authorities at 12 mg/L. Finally, caffeine is a useful and reliable probe drug for the assessment of CYP1A2 activity, which is of considerable interest for metabolic studies in human populations.

The polymorphic human cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) metabolises a number of drugs, activates a variety of precarcinogens and constitutes the major nicotine C-oxidase. A relationship between CYP2A6 genotype and smoking habits, as well as incidence of lung cancer, has been proposed. Two defective alleles have hitherto been identified, one of which is very common in Asian populations. Among Caucasians, an additional defective and frequently distributed allele (CYP2A6*3) has been suggested to play a protective role against nicotine addiction and cigarette consumption. Here, we have re-evaluated the genotyping method used for the CYP2A6*3 allele and found that a gene conversion in the 3P P flanking region of 30^40% of CYP2A6*1 alleles results in genotype misclassification. In fact, no true CYP2A6*3 alleles were found among 100 Spaniards and 96 Chinese subjects. In one Spanish poor metaboliser of the CYP2A6 probe drug coumarin, we found two novel defective alleles. One, CYP2A6*5, encoded an unstable enzyme having a G479L substitution and the other was found to carry a novel type of CYP2A6 gene deletion (CYP2A6*4D). The results imply the presence of numerous defective as well as active CYP2A6 alleles as a consequence of CYP2A6/CYP2A7 gene conversion events. We conclude that molecular epidemiological studies concerning CYP2A6 require validated genotyping methods for accurate detection of all known defective CYP2A6 alleles.z 1999 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

In a previous study we showed that the disposition of clozapine after a single oral dose is unrelated to either debrisoquine or S-mephenytoin hydroxylation polymorphism. The same 14 healthy subjects studied in that investigation were given 150 mg of caffeine. The reciprocal of plasma clozapine AUC (0,24), was correlated with an index of the N3-demethylation of caffeine (r, = 0.84; P = 0.0024), used as a measure of cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) activity. Ni-and N7-demethylation indices of caffeine also reflect CYP1A2 activity and were also correlated with clozapine clearance (rs = 0.89 and 0.85; P = 0.0013 and 0.0023; respectively). No significant relationships with xanthine oxidase and N-acetyl transferase activity, also assessed by a caffeine test, were found. This study suggests that clozapine is metabolised by CYP1A2 to a major extent.

Twenty-five healthy volunteers were given 100 mg caffeine orally and several estimates of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) activity were evaluated. The validation was performed by correlation of different parameters in plasma, saliva, and urine to two measures of caffeine clearance, CL(oral) and CL(137X-->17X) that served as standards of reference. Two subjects were excluded because of noncompliance with a caffeine-free diet. In the remaining 23 subjects, both plasma and saliva total clearances of caffeine were highly correlated with each other (r(s) = 0.97, p < 0.0001). The ratio 17X/137X restricted to one sampling point taken 4 hours after dose, showed a high correlation (r(s)) with CL(oral) and CL(137X-->17X) in plasma (0.84/0.83) and saliva (0.82/0.77) (p < 0.0001 for all the correlation values) where 17X is 1,7-dimethylxanthine (paraxanthine) and 137X is 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (caffeine). Additionally, the ratio (AFMU + 1U + 1X + 17U + 17X)/137X in a 0-24 hours urine sampling showed the highest correlation with CL(137X-->17X) (r(s) = 0.85, p < 0.001) where AFMU is 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil, 1U is 1-methyluracil, 1X is 1-methylxanthine, and 17U is 1,7-dimethyluric acid. The major estimates of CYP1A2 activity were significantly less in nonsmoking females, and this probably was related to the use of oral contraceptives in this subpopulation. In summary, among caffeine-based approaches for CYP1A2, the authors recommend either plasma or saliva 17X/137X ratio and the urinary (AFMU + 1U + 1X + 17U + 17X)/137X ratio during a sampling interval of at least 8 hours, starting at time zero since caffeine intake. These indices are simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive estimates of CYP1A2 activity to be used in the study of human populations.

This study investigated whether the smokinginducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and the polymorphic CYP2D6 play significant roles in the metabolism of olanzapine and its clinical effects at steady-state treatment. Caffeine and debrisoquine were used as measures of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, respectively. After drug therapy for 15 days, the effect of olanzapine on the activities of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 was also examined. Seventeen psychiatric patients (9 men and 8 women) were orally administered olanzapine, at a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) dosage of 10 mg/d for all smokers (n = 8) and 7.5 +/- 2.5 mg/d (range, 5-10 mg) for nonsmokers (n = 9;p <0.01). The plasma concentration-to-dose (C:D) ratio was closely correlated to the CYP1A2 activity ( s = -0.89;p <0.0001). The mean urinary caffeine indexes of nonsmokers and smokers were 17 +/- 8 and 101 +/- 44, respectively, indicating that smoking had induced a sixfold higher CYP1A2 activity (p <0.0001). Likewise, the olanzapine plasma C:D ratio (ng.mL.mg) was about fivefold lower in smokers (7.9 +/- 2.6) than in nonsmokers (1.56 +/- 1.1;p <0.0001). On day 15 of the antipsychotic therapy, the percentage decrease in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score relative to the predosing score (in the drug-free period) was higher for nonsmokers than for smokers (30.4 +/- 10% vs. 12.5 +/- 14%;p <0.01). Six nonsmokers and three smokers experienced side effects with olanzapine. After 15 days of drug treatment, olanzapine had caused significant (p <0.0001) and substantial CYP1A2 inhibition (by 50%) in comparison with predosing values, and such inhibition can contribute to adverse drug interactions. In conclusion, smoking-induced increased CYP1A2 activity significantly diminished plasma olanzapine concentrations and the antipsychotic effect of the drug. The performance of a simple caffeine test may assist in individualization of the olanzapine dosage.