Background/Aims: In July 2017, the Emprint™ next-generation microwave ablation system using thermosphere technology (Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA) was approved for use in Japan. This system can produce a predictable spherical ablation zone at higher temperatures than radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether this new microwave thermosphere ablation (MTA) could safely improve outcome compared to RFA, which is the standard of care for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 513 patients with 630 HCCs (≤3 cm) who were performed by percutaneous RFA (174 patients, 214 HCCs) or MTA (339 patients, 416 HCCs) between January 2016 and March 2020.Results: Median ablation time was significantly shorter for MTA (240 seconds) than for RFA (721 seconds; P<0.001). A significant difference in 3-year local tumor progression rate was evident between the RFA group (22%) and MTA group (8%; P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed ablation procedure and tumor diameter as independent factors contributing to local tumor progression (MTA; P<0.001; hazard ratio, 0.565; 95% confidence interval, 0.437–0.731). In patients with primary HCC, a significant difference in overall survival was evident (RFA vs. MTA, 3-year, 77% vs. 95%, P=0.029). Ablation procedure and Child-Pugh score were independent factors contributing to survival. The total complication rate was significantly lower for MTA (8%) than for RFA (14%, P<0.05), particularly for bile duct injury (3% vs. 9%, respectively; P<0.05).Conclusions: Next-generation MTA for small HCC could provide safer, more curative treatment in a shorter ablation time than RFA.
Aim Although fibrates were developed as lipid‐lowering drugs, their efficacy against liver dysfunction in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and fatty liver disease, has also been reported. Although fibrates act on some peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARs), pemafibrate is a novel selective PPAR‐α modulator. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate in patients with chronic liver disease. Methods We analyzed 58 patients with chronic liver disease who switched from bezafibrate to pemafibrate because of minor adverse effects and/or incomplete response. Results This study included 41 patients with cholestatic liver disease and 17 patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Reasons for switching to pemafibrate were renal function decline in 31 patients, hemoglobin decline in 17 patients, creatine kinase (CK) elevation in 11 patients, incomplete response of liver dysfunction in 39 patients, and incomplete response of hyperlipidemia in 13 patients. After 3 months, although no significant change in CK was seen, hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly increased, and creatinine was significantly decreased. Significant decreases in hepatobiliary enzymes were seen in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, but not in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. No significant changes in serum lipids were observed. No patients discontinued pemafibrate due to adverse events. Conclusions Switching to pemafibrate could improve adverse effects due to bezafibrate, and appeared effective against liver dysfunction in cholestatic liver disease patients with incomplete response to bezafibrate.
Although glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GP) therapy is recommended as a first-line treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, serious drug-induced liver injury occasionally develops. The present study aimed to elucidate real-world risk factors for GP-induced liver injury and to evaluate the efficacy of add-on ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for liver injury. We analyzed 236 HCV patients who received GP therapy. GP-induced liver injury was defined as any elevation to grade ≥1 in total bilirubin (TB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) during treatment without other cause. The frequency of GP-induced liver injury was 61.9% (146/236). Serious elevation to grade ≥3 in TB, AST, ALT, ALP, and γ-GT was identified in 3.8% (9/236), 0%, 0%, 0%, and 0.4% (1/209), respectively. Therapy discontinuation and dose reduction were seen in one patient each. Multivariate analysis revealed age and TB as independent risk factors for GP-induced liver injury. In patients with grade ≥2 hyperbilirubinemia, TB after onset significantly decreased in the add-on UDCA group but not in the no UDCA group. Careful attention to GP-induced liver injury is warranted for elderly patients with cirrhosis. Add-on UDCA could suppress the aggravation of GP-induced liver injury.
Liver-related mortality rates in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) increase with advancing liver fibrosis stage. The present study aimed to elucidate whether adding non-invasive liver fibrosis tests to a comprehensive health checkup system is useful for NASH screening. Both serum Mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) and point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using ultrasonography were performed for 483 health checkup subjects who consented to participate in this prospective study. Outcomes in positive subjects were surveyed 1 year later. Eighty-eight subjects (18%) showed positive results for at least one liver fibrosis test, with 63 subjects positive for pSWE, 33 subjects positive for M2BPGi, and 72 subjects showing no significant elevation of liver enzymes. The secondary consultation rate for positive subjects was 52% (46/88). However, as 15 of those 46 subjects visited a non-liver-specialist and could not undergo detailed examination, the secondary examination rate was only 35% (31/88). For the 31 subjects who received secondary examination, NASH was diagnosed in 14 subjects, other chronic liver disease (CLD) in 6 subjects, and no CLD in 11 subjects. Additional liver fibrosis tests using M2BPGi and pSWE appear useful in health checkups when screening for CLD, especially for NASH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.