No abstract

No abstract

Background Simple pericardial injuries are asymptomatic in many cases and usually do not cause bleeding that leads to cardiac tamponade. In this study, however, we report a case involving a patient with pericardial injury, in whom extravasation in the pericardium was identified using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Case presentation A 67-year-old man fell from a 3-m-high ladder and was injured and transported to our hospital. No pericardial effusion was observed on focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) or plain CT on arrival, but pericardial effusion was detected on follow-up observation. Thereafter, his circulatory dynamics began to deteriorate. We then performed FAST to identify the bleeding source, but it was difficult to visualize on echocardiography. Thus, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was performed and extravasation was confirmed in the pericardium. We believed that the accumulation of pericardial effusion caused cardiac tamponade; hence, we performed emergent thoracotomy. When we released the cardiac tamponade, his circulatory dynamics improved, and we could stabilize the patient’s condition by ligating the bleeding vessel from the pericardium. Conclusion If visualization is difficult on FAST, like in this case, CECT is useful for identifying the cause of pericardial effusion if circulatory dynamics can be determined. We were able to confirm that extravasation occurred from the pericardium using CECT; hence, we could confirm that pericardial injury caused bleeding and may cause cardiac tamponade. Thus, if cardiac tamponade is suspected, not only damage to the heart itself, but also damage caused by pericardial vascular injury should be considered. Further, if circulatory dynamics are stable, CECT should be performed.

Introduction. Perforation of pyometra is often severe but rare. We report a case of pyometra detected on second-look surgery in an elderly patient with life-threatening septic shock and cardiopulmonary arrest before hospital arrival. Case Presentation. A 70-year-old woman with cardiopulmonary arrest received adrenaline. Computed tomography revealed ascites, and abdominal paracentesis was performed to identify the cause of cardiopulmonary arrest. The ascitic fluid was purulent, and intraperitoneal infection was identified. Emergency exploratory laparotomy revealed pyometra. Conclusion. If perforated, pyometra may cause peritonitis and lethal septic shock. Not only gynecologists but also emergency physicians should be aware of this possibility. Moreover, patient education is necessary. In patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, diagnostic abdominal paracentesis should be performed when the sole imaging finding is ascites. Improving outcomes in patients with difficult-to-diagnose pyometra with cardiopulmonary arrest by implementing damage control strategies before hysterectomy is possible.

Penetrating neck injury by a crossbow bolt is extremely rare and can be life-threatening. When removing a crossbow bolt from the neck, it is necessary to protect against fatal bleeding from the carotid vessels. We report removing a crossbow bolt penetrating the neck, with an endovascular approach. A 49-year-old woman was shot in the neck by a crossbow and was transferred to our hospital. On presentation, the crossbow bolt totally penetrated the neck from right to left. Her level of consciousness was clear, with no significant neurological deficits except for right peripheral facial palsy. Neck contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed the crossbow bolt in contact with bilateral external and internal carotid arteries and that the bolt caused dissection of the left main trunk of the external carotid artery. Under general anesthesia, the crossbow bolt was removed under fluoroscopy with the assistance of an endovascular approach. First, we performed coil embolization for the dissected external carotid artery. Second, we prepared for fatal bleeding from the carotid arteries during crossbow bolt removal under protection using guiding catheters placed in bilateral common carotid arteries. The bolt was removed successfully without significant bleeding, and no complications occurred during the procedure. We report the successful removal of a crossbow bolt penetrating the neck. When removing a crossbow bolt penetrating the neck, endovascular assistance may be feasible to protect against fatal bleeding from the carotid arteries.