The repressor 8EF1 was discovered by its action on the DC5 fragment of the lens-specific 81-crystallin enhancer. C-proximal zinc fingers of 8EF1 were found responsible for binding to the DC5 fragment and had specificity to CACCT as revealed by selection of high-affinity binding sequences from a random oligonucleotide pool. CACCT is present not only in DC5 but also in the E2 box (CACCTG) elements which are the binding sites of various basic helix-loop-helix activators and also the target of an unidentified repressor, raising the possibility that 8EF1 accounts for the E2 box repressor activity. 8EF1 competed with E47 for binding to an E2 box sequence in vitro. In lymphoid cells, endogenous 8EF1 activity as a repressor was detectable, and exogenous 8EF1 repressed immunoglobulin K enhancer by binding to the KE2 site. Moreover, bEF1 repressed MyoD-dependent activation of the muscle creatine kinase enhancer and MyoD-induced myogenesis of 1OT1/2 cells. Thus, 8lEF1 counteracts basic helix-loop-helix activators through binding site competition and fulfills the conditions of the E2 box repressor. In embryonic tissues, the most prominent site of &;EF1 expression is the myotome. Myotomal expression as well as the above results argues for a significant contribution of 6EF1 in regulation of embryonic myogenesis through the modulation of the actions of MyoD family proteins.Cumulative evidence has indicated that repressors interacting with activators play crucial roles in developmental gene regulation. In the best-studied cases of transcriptional regulatory elements generating developmental specificities, it is found that a binding site of a repressor overlaps with a binding site of an activator so that the regulators of the opposite effects compete for occupancy of the same site (16,28,29,32). In general, the repressor is more widely distributed in spatial and temporal terms than the activators. Thus, in the majority of cell types the repressor occupies the element and shuts off expression of the gene, and only under conditions in which binding of the activator to the element dominates over that of the repressor is expression of the gene turned on. This seems one of the basic mechanisms to elicit stage-specific or cell-typespecific gene expression.An example is found in immunoglobulin enhancers in which E2 box activator binding sites with the core sequence of CACCTG have been identified. A group of basic helix-loophelix (bHLH) activator proteins (25) which are encoded by E2A and E2-2 genes (3) and bind to the E2 site of the immunoglobulin K enhancer (and the ,uE5 site of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer as well) are in competition with a repressor, and only in differentiated lymphoid cells is the action of the activator effectuated and immunoglobulin K enhancer activated (29). The same scenario holds true for regulatory elements of myocyte-specific genes such as AChRb in which activators containing myogenic MyoD family proteins as their component bind to an E2-box-activating element (32). In these cases, action of the r...

The mes-metencephalic boundary (isthmus) has been suggested to act as an organizer in the development of the optic tectum. Pax-5 was cloned as a candidate for regulator of the organizing center. Isthmus-specific expression of Pax-5 and analogy with the genetic cascade in Drosophila suggest that Pax-5 may be at a higher hierarchical position in the gene regulation cascade of tectum development. To examine this possibility, a gain-of-function experiment on Pax-5 was carried out. In ovo electroporation on E2 chick brain with the eucaryotic expression vector that encodes chick Pax-5 cDNA was used. Not only was a considerable amount of Pax-5 expressed ectopically in the transfected brain, but irregular bulging of the neuroepithelium was induced in the diencephalon and mesencephalon. At Pax-5 misexpressing sites, uptake of BrdU was increased. Histological examination of E7 transfected brain revealed that Pax-5 caused transdifferentiation of diencephalon into the tectum-like structure. In the bulges of the E7 mesencephalon, differentiation of laminar structure was repressed when compared to the normal side. In transfected embryos, En-2, Wnt-1 and Fgf8 were up-regulated ectopically, and Otx2 was down-regulated in the diencephalon to mesencephalon. Moreover, Ephrin-A2, which is expressed specifically in the tectum with a gradient highest at the caudal end, is suggested to be involved in pathfinding of the retinal fibers, and was induced in the bulges. When the mouse Fgf8 expression vector was electroporated, Pax-5 and chick Fgf8 were also induced ectopically. These results suggest that Pax-5, together with Fgf8, hold a higher position in the genetic hierarchy of the isthmus organizing center and regulate its activity.

Otx2 is expressed in the mesencephalon and prosencephalon, and Gbx2 is expressed in the rhombencephalon around stage 10. Loss-of-function studies of these genes in mice have revealed that Otx2 is indispensable for the development of the anterior brain segment, and that Gbx2 is required for the development of the isthmus. We carried out gain-of-function experiments of these genes in chick embryos with a newly developed gene transfer system, in ovo electroporation. When Otx2 was ectopically expressed caudally beyond the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB), the alar plate of the metencephalon differentiated into the optic tectum instead of differentiating into the cerebellum. On the other hand, when Gbx2 was ectopically expressed at the mesencephalon, the caudal limit of the tectum shifted rostrally. We looked at the effects of misexpression on the isthmus- and tectum-related molecules. Otx2 and Gbx2 interacted to repress each other's expression. Ectopic Otx2 and Gbx2 repressed endogenous expression of Fgf8 in the isthmus, but induced Fgf8 expression at the interface between Otx2 and Gbx2 expression. Thus, it is suggested that interaction between Otx2 and Gbx2 determines the site of Fgf8 expression and the posterior limit of the tectum.

The physicochemical properties of an amyloidogenic mutant human lysozyme (Ile56Thr) were examined in order to elucidate the mechanism of amyloid formation. The crystal structure of the mutant protein was the same as the wild-type structure, except that the hydroxyl group of the introduced Thr56 formed a hydrogen bond with a water molecule in the interior of the protein. The other physicochemical properties of the mutant protein in the native state were not different from those of the wild-type protein. However, the equilibrium and kinetic stabilities of the mutant protein were remarkably decreased due to the introduction of a polar residue (Thr) in the interior of the molecule. It can be concluded that the amyloid formation of the mutant human lysozyme is due to a tendency to favor (partly or/and completely) denatured structures.

No abstract