Unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) has now become more common, but as yet there have been only a few reports on its outcome compared with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), especially for adults. We studied the clinical outcomes of 113 adult patients with hematologic malignancies who received unrelated BM transplants (n ؍ 45) or unrelated CB transplants (n ؍ 68). We analyzed the hematopoietic recovery, rates of graftversus-host disease (GVHD), risks of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and relapse, and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. The time from donor search to transplantation was significantly shorter among CB transplant recipients (median, 2 months) than BM transplant recipients (median, 11 months; P < .01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated slow neutrophil (P < .01) and platelet (P < .01) recoveries in CBT patients compared with BMT patients. Despite rapid tapering of immunosuppressants after transplantation and infrequent use of steroids to treat severe acute GVHD, there were no GVHD-related deaths among CB transplant recipients compared with 10 deaths of 24 among BM transplant recipients. Unrelated CBT showed better TRM and DFS results compared with BMT (P ؍ .02 and P < .01, respectively), despite the higher human leukocyte antigen mismatching rate and lower number of infused cells. These data strongly suggest that CBT could be safely and effectively used for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. (Blood. 2004;104:3813-3820)
We studied the clinical outcomes of 171 adults with hematologic malignancies who received unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) as a primary unrelated stem-cell source (n ؍ 100), or bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem-cell transplant (PBSCT) from related donors (n ؍ 71, 55 BMT and 16 PBSCT). All patients received myeloablative regimens including 12 Gy total body irradiation. We analyzed the hematologic recovery, and risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplantation-related mortality (TRM) and relapse, and diseasefree survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Significant delays in engraftment occurred after cord blood transplantation; however, overall engraftment rates were almost the same for both grafts. The cumulative incidences of grades III to IV acute and extensive-type chronic GVHDs among CBT recipients were significantly lower than those among BMT/PBSCT recipients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no apparent differences in TRM (9% in CBT and 13% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), relapse (17% in CBT and 26% in BMT/PBSCT recipients), and DFS (70% in CBT and 60% in BMT/ PBSCT recipients) between both groups. These data suggest that unrelated cord blood could be as safe and effective a stem-cell source as related bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood for adult patients when it is used as a primary unrelated stem-cell source. (Blood. 2007;
Summary. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 28 adult patients after cord blood transplantation (CBT) from unrelated donors was compared with that after bone marrow transplantation from HLA (human leucocyte antigen)-matched related (R-BMT) and unrelated (U-BMT) donors. Positive CMV antigenaemia was seen in 19 (79%) of 24 CMV-seropositive patients at a median of 42 d (range 29-85 d) after CBT, but in zero of four CMV-seronegative patients. This did not differ significantly from values observed after R-BMT and U-BMT (66%, P ¼ 0AE22, and 60%, P ¼ 0AE15 respectively). Based on the antigenaemia results, 16 patients (67%) received pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy from a median of 47 d (range 36-67 d) after CBT. This proportion was higher than that observed after R-BMT (28%, P ¼ 0AE0048), but did not differ from that after U-BMT (50%, P ¼ 0AE21). In addition, the probability of requiring more than two courses of ganciclovir therapy after CBT (21%) was higher than after R-BMT and U-BMT (0%, P ¼ 0AE015 and 0AE039 respectively). One patient (5%) developed CMV disease after U-BMT, whereas no patients developed CMV disease after CBT or R-BMT. The CMV serostatus, use of a steroid and HLA disparity affected the probability of requiring ganciclovir therapy after CBT (P ¼ 0AE024, 0AE032 and 0AE017 respectively). These results suggest that recovery of CMV-specific immunity after CBT is delayed when compared with BMT.
We report the results of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) for 18 adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The median age was 43 years, the median weight was 55.2 kg, and the median number of cryopreserved nucleated cells was 2.51 ؋ 10 7 /kg. Seventeen patients had myeloid reconstitution and the median time to more than 0.5 ؋ 10 9 / L absolute neutrophil count was 23 days. A self-sustained platelet count more than 50 ؋ 10 9 /L was achieved in 16 patients at a median time of 49 days. Acute graft-versushost disease (GVHD) above grade II occurred in 11 of 17 evaluable patients and chronic GVHD occurred in 14 of 17 evaluable patients. Fourteen patients are alive and free of disease at between 185 and 1332 days after transplantation. The probability of disease-free survival at 2 years was 76.6%. These results suggest that adult AML patients without suitable related or unrelated bone marrow donors should be considered as candidates for CBT.
We report the results of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) for 13 adult patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The median age was 40 years, the median weight was 51 kg, and the median number of infused nucleated cells was 2.43 ؋ 10 7 /kg. Twelve patients had myeloid reconstitution, and the median time to more than 0.5 ؋ 10 9 /L (5 ؋ 10 8 /L) absolute neutrophil count was 22.5 days. A self-sustained platelet count more than 50 ؋ 10 9 /L was achieved in 11 patients at a median time of 49 days. Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurred in 9 of 12 evaluable patients and chronic GVHD in 8 of 11 evaluable patients. Ten patients are alive and free of disease at between 171 and 1558 days after transplantation. The probability of disease-free survival at 2 years was 76.2%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.