No abstract

In this study, an investigation on the hull roughness measurement of a new ship, a 160m class car ferry, was performed. The hull roughness measurement was conducted in the ferry's pre-coated state before launching. For measurement, the TQC manual and ITTC recommendations were considered, and measurements were made in a total of 230 zones below waterline of the ship. Accordingly, the average hull roughness of the car ferry was 81 , which is relatively low compared to 150 , the hull roughness of a new ship proposed by the ITTC. In addition, the measurement uncertainty was calculated using the ISO guidelines, and the effect of the number of zones on the hull roughness measurement was examined. Using the measured average hull roughness, we estimated the resistance performance at the design speed of the ship. Accordingly, it was confirmed that the total resistance of the new ship was reduced by approximately 2% owing to a decrease in its frictional resistance increase.

This study investigated the resistance performance of ships, using the air resistance correction method. In general, air resistance is calculated using an empirical formula rather than a direct calculation, as the effect of air resistance on the total resistance of ships is relatively smaller than that of water. However, for ships with large superstructures, such as container ships, LNG (liquefied natural gas) carriers, and car-ferries, the wind-induced effects might influence the air resistance acting on the superstructure, as well as cause attitude (trim and sinkage) changes of the ship. Therefore, this study performed numerical simulations to compare the total resistance, trim, and sinkage of an 8000 TEU-class container, ship with and without superstructures. The numerical simulation conditions were verified by comparing them with the study results of the KCS (KRISO Container Ship) hull form. In addition, the differences in the above values between the two cases were compared using the coefficients calculated by the empirical formula to identify the effects on the air resistance coefficient.

No abstract

No abstract