BackgroundLocoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy can further improve the prognoses for HCC. However, the efficacy of TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs for HCC and whether this triple therapy can activate systemic immune response are still unknown.PurposeTo identify the efficacy of TACE+ICIs+TKIs for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and its effect on systemic immunity.Materials and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. From August 1, 2019, to March 30, 2021, patients with uHCC who received the combination therapy of TACE+ICIs+TKIs were included. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and once a month for 4 months after treatment. Lymphocyte subsets were measured by flow cytometry. Immunoglobulins were measured using the immune turbidimetric method. The dynamic change trend of circulating parameters was tested using simple linear regression.ResultsFifty-three patients with a mean age of 59 ± 10.6 years were included. TTP was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.5–10.5) and PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.4–11.5). ORR was 52.8% and DCR was 81.1%. Twenty patients had completed analysis of biomarkers in peripheral blood. For cellular immune response, the level of circulating CD8+, CD3+ T cells and NK cells increased, the frequency of CD4+T cells and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio decreased, and among them, CD8+ T cells increased significantly. For humoral immune response, there was a significant decrease in B cells and a significant increase in Ig G, Ig κ, and Ig λ. Moreover, Ig G, Ig κ, and Ig λ were related to tumor response.ConclusionTACE+ICIs+TKIs showed considerable efficacy in patients with uHCC. This triple therapy activated not only cell immune but also humoral immune activation. Circulating Ig G, Ig λ, and Ig κ can serve as potential biomarkers.

PurposeTo explore the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Materials and MethodsFrom August 2019 to July 2020, patients who received TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 31 patients with uHCC were included. Eleven patients were classified as BCLC-C. Nineteen patients had multiple lesions, and the cumulative targeted lesions were 69 mm (range, 21-170 mm) according to mRECIST. Twenty-nine (93%) patients experienced at least one AE during the treatment. Four (12.9%) patients developed AEs of higher grade (grade≥3). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 64.5% and 77.4%, respectively. The median time to response was 7 weeks (range, 4-30 w), and the duration of response was 17.5 weeks (range, 2-46 w). From the first ICIs, TTP and PFS were 6.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-11) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-NE), respectively.ConclusionsTACE combined with ICIs and TKIs shows an acceptable safety profile and considerable efficacy in patients with HCC.

No abstract

ObjectiveMethylation of the promoters of SHOX2 and RASSF1A are potentially informative biomarkers for the diagnosis of early lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Abnormal methylation of SHOX2 and RASSF1A promoters may promote the occurrence and facilitate the progression of LUAD.Materials and MethodsWe selected 54 patients with early LUAD and 31 patients with benign lung nodules as a NJDT cohort and evaluated their DNA methylation and mRNA sequencing levels. The DNA methylation sequencing, mRNA sequencing, and clinical data for patients with LUAD were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and served as a TCGA cohort. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of a SHOX2 and RASSF1A combined promoter methylation assay for detection of early LUAD in the NJDT cohort. Then we explored the promoter methylation levels of SHOX2 and RASSF1A and their gene expression between normal and tumor samples at different stages in both cohorts. Pathways enriched between tumor and normal samples of methylation-positive patients in the NJDT cohort were analyzed.ResultsIn the NJDT cohort, the sensitivity of the combined promoter methylation assay on tumor samples was 74.07%, the sensitivity on paired tumor and paracancerous samples was 77.78%, and the specificities in both contexts were 100%. The combined promoter methylation-positive patients had clinicopathologic features including older age, larger tumors, deeper invasion, and higher Ki-67 expression. In both cohorts, SHOX2 expression increased and RASSF1A expression decreased in tumor samples. The promoter methylation level of SHOX2 and RASSF1A was significantly higher in tumor samples at stage I-II than that in normal samples. The promoter methylation levels of these two genes were both negative associated with their expression in early tumor samples. In the NJDT cohort, methylation-positive patients of both individual SHOX2 and RASSF1A assays exhibited upregulation of folate acid metabolism and nucleotide metabolism in tumor samples. The SHOX2 methylation-positive and RASSF1A methylation-positive patients showed the downregulation of pathways related to cell proliferation and apoptosis and pathways involved in DNA repair, cell growth and cell adhesion, respectively.ConclusionThe combined promoter methylation assay for SHOX2 and RASSF1A can be used for screening and diagnosis of early LUAD, with good sensitivity and specificity. The promoter methylation levels of SHOX2 and RASSF1A were associated with their abnormal mRNA expression, and affected DNA instability, cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor microenvironment in patients with LUAD.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (TACE+IT) versus ICIs plus TKIs (IT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods Data of consecutive advanced HCC patients receiving TACE+IT or IT between January 2019 and December 2021 were included and were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias due to confounding variables. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs), respectively. Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the study, among which 24 and 40 received TACE+IT and IT, respectively. The PSM cohort included 24 patients receiving TACE+IT (TACE+IT group) and 24 patients receiving IT (IT group) alone. During a median follow-up of 23 months, patients in TACE+IT group had significantly longer OS (median, 17.3 vs 11.8 months, P = 0.023), better ORR (41.7% vs 12.5%, P = 0.023) and DCR (79.2% vs 50.0%, P = 0.035) than those in the IT group, whereas a non-significant trend in PFS (median, 7.4 vs 6.7 months, P = 0.23) was observed. According to multivariable cox regression analysis, it was found that treatment modality was the only independent risk factor for OS (HR = 0.404, 95% CI = 0.179–0.911, P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences in AEs associated with ICIs and TKIs between the two groups, with the exception of gastrointestinal reaction. Conclusion TACE combined with ICIs plus TKIs significantly improved OS, ORR, and DCR and showed a relatively longer PFS trend over ICIs combined with TKIs for advanced HCC.