The strategy of producing rapid initial growth and establishing early in the growing season is important, and it is employed by invasive macrophytes.
Elodea nuttallii
and
Egeria densa
, two Hydrocharitaceae species, became weeds after invading many countries in recent years. Comparative studies on their invasive traits in relation to native species during winter and spring are limited. In the present study, we compared the growth performance of these two exotic species with a perennial native species,
Potamogeton maackianus
, in different water depths (1, 2, and 3 m) during winter (January and February) and spring (March and April). Three morphological traits (shoot number, root number and shoot length), total biomass, relative growth rate (RGR) and two physiological photosynthetic traits (total chlorophyll content and the maximum quantum yield of PSII [
F
v/
F
m]) were measured for each macrophyte. All three species could overwinter as entirely leafy plants. Biomass, RGR, morphological traits and physiological traits were all different among species. However, water depths had a significant effect only on morphological traits. At all water depths,
E. nuttallii
had significantly higher values for morphological traits, total biomass and RGR than
P. maackianus
, while
E. densa
had significantly fewer roots and a lower total chlorophyll content than
P. maackianus
. Except for
F
v/
F
m at a 3 m water depth, morphological and physiological photosynthetic traits, biomass and RGR of
E. nuttallii
were significantly higher than those of
E. densa.
In addition, a large number of adventitious roots developed from
E. nuttallii
but not from the other two species. These results indicate that the advantages of
E. nuttallii
to grow in winter and spring may make it more prone to expansion than
E. densa
in China.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.