Summary What is known and objectives Obstetrics services are a high‐throughput and high‐risk environment poised for pharmacist involvement, but determining how to ideally allocate services is difficult. There is recent interest in the development of tools for service prioritization, but none are specifically targeted to obstetrics. Therefore, the aim of this study was (i) to conduct a practice audit surveying the demographics of patients attending obstetrics wards at a high‐capacity maternity hospital; and (ii) to evaluate a triage tool developed to prioritize pharmacy services. Methods A retrospective case review of women discharged after birth admissions was undertaken at a hospital in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland during June 2014. Demographic and admission data were collected, as well as pharmacist interventions and missed opportunities in patient care on post‐natal wards. A pharmacy triage tool was developed and retrospectively applied to each case to ascertain a risk category that would trigger and target pharmacist review. Interventions/opportunities were classified as either clinical (medication related) or administrative (potential for error development). Results and discussion One hundred and seventy‐five cases were reviewed with a median age of 29 years old. Eighty‐six patients (49·1%) were retrospectively classified with elevated risk using the triage tool. A total of 117 charts (66·9%) were identified with missed opportunities for pharmacist intervention, which was significantly greater among patients classified as higher risk (75·6 vs. 58·4%, P = 0·017). Compared to low‐risk patients, patients with a higher‐risk classification had lower rates of administrative missed opportunities (55·4 vs. 80·8%, P = 0·015), but numerically higher rates of clinical (26·2 vs. 9·6%, p=NS) and mixed clinical/administrative (18·5 vs. 9·6%, p=NS) missed opportunities, although this failed to reach statistical significance. What is new and conclusion Evaluation of a triage tool for obstetric services demonstrated potential for prioritizing higher‐risk patients for pharmacist review and addressing opportunities for clinical improvements.

A majority of infants <32 weeks' gestation did not achieve the recommended phosphate intake during the first week of life. Despite achieving the recommended phosphate intake from week 3, many infants did not have plasma phosphate concentrations within the accepted normal range. Additional oral supplementation may help to achieve blood phosphate concentrations within this target range.

(1) Background: Sepsis is the leading cause of maternal death in 11–15% of women worldwide. This emphasises the importance of administrating timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy to women with sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in women diagnosed with peripartum sepsis. (2) Method: A prospective observational cohort study in a single Scottish health region with 12,233 annual live births. Data were collected on women diagnosed with sepsis in the peripartum period using physical and electronic medical records, drug Kardex® (medication administration) and ward handover records. (3) Results: A sepsis diagnosis was concluded in 89 of the 2690 pregnancy cases reviewed, with a median hospital stay of four days. Good overall adherence to the local guidelines for the empiric antimicrobial treatment of sepsis was observed. Group B Streptococcus was associated with 20.8% of maternal sepsis cases, whilst in 60% of clinical specimens tested no causative pathogen was isolated. (4) Conclusion: The lack of specific and sensitive clinical markers for sepsis, coupled with their inconsistent clinical application to inform diagnosis, hindered effective antimicrobial stewardship. This was further exacerbated by the lack of positive culture isolates from clinical specimens, which meant that patients were often continued on broader-spectrum empiric treatment.

No abstract