No abstract

The experience and perceptions of 80 people residing in four separate sites, which feature reclaimed water systems, are considered in this paper in relation to the benefits and costs of residential water reuse applications. Reclaimed water is used for non-potable applications by residents in Florida mainly for garden irrigation and in Australia for both irrigation and toilet flushing. All respondents value reclaimed water and although the benefit of water conservation is identified they are more enthusiastic about the personal cost benefit involved in using this cheaper alternative to potable water. Many are willing to handle the water but the extent to which this increased exposure is seen as a good development depends on the quality of information provided to users. In relation to reclaimed water for toilet flushing, there is a strong indication that the water conservation and cost saving benefit is small compared to the initial cost and the increased cross connection risk.

Ensuring adequate water supplies in urban Australia is a problem of considerable concern to State and federal governments. A variety of technical solutions are available, including water recycling. While there has been policy support for water recycling, public perceptions are seen by industry stakeholders as a significant impediment to the implementation of recycled water schemes. This article reports baseline data on attitudes to water recycling and its uses in a representative sample of Australians from major urban areas. Sociological frameworks for interpreting the results focus on understanding how people assess the risks associated with recycled water. Three perspectives are outlined, and their consistency with the survey results is analysed. The epistemologically realist view, often the fallback of water professionals and policy makers, is shown to have limited applicability. An interpretation focused on the cultural meanings associated with different forms and uses of water is found to be consistent with many aspects of Australians' expressed views about water recycling, as is a view focused on the `risk society' thesis. The article considers the implications of these findings.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a specialist nursing service programme for people with an intellectual disability residing in the community. It is important to correct the imbalance in the literature that has neglected the voices of the clients themselves or denied expression by their proxies. The aim of the study was to gain a better understanding of matters of importance for clients and their families and to involve them in the evaluation of a service that directly affects their care. Only three clients were able to participate; however, 17 parents (next of kin) agreed to be interviewed. In-depth interviews were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed relating to the questions asked and were checked against the domains of the nursing practice in the disability area: continuity of care, advanced nursing practice, education and credentialling, personal and professional attributes, primary health care, and normalization. The findings confirm the high regard in which the programme is held. Service evaluation is crucial in providing evidence for programme funders. The favourable outcome of this evaluation meant that the programme gained funding for another few years.