Preeclampsia (PE) is a disorder specific to pregnancy characterized by new-onset hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. There is no definite treatment for PE except delivery of the placenta. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the biological pathways involved in the development of PE and to discover a novel biomarker for PE by performing global gene expression analysis of amniotic fluid cell-free RNA.The participants were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of CHA Gangnam Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between March 2014 and February 2015. Eight samples were collected from 8 subjects at second trimester who were later diagnosed with PE. From the amniotic fluid samples, cell-free RNA extraction was performed and gene expression was analyzed using the GeneChip PrimeView Array. Transcriptome data previously analyzed by our group from 9 euploid mid-trimester amniotic fluid samples were used as the control for comparative analysis. Functional analysis of the probe sets was performed using the online Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) toolkit 6.7.We identified 1841 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the PE group and the control. Of these, 1557 genes were upregulated in the PE group, while 284 genes were upregulated in the control. The functional annotation of DEGs identified specific enriched functions such as “transport,” “signal transduction,” and “stress response.” Functional annotation clustering with enriched genes in the PE group revealed that translation-related genes, cell–cell adhesion genes, and immune-related genes were enriched. KEGG pathway analysis showed that several biological pathways, including the ribosome pathway and various immune pathways, were dysregulated. Several genes, including RPS29, IGF-2, and UBC, were significantly upregulated in PE, up to tenfold.This study provides the first genome-wide expression analysis of amniotic fluid cell-free RNA in PE. The results showed that gene expression involving the ribosome pathway and immunologic pathways are dysregulated in PE. Our results will aid in understanding the underlying pathogenesis of PE.
We aimed to investigate the feasibility of robotic adenomyomectomy and compared surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic approaches for adenomyomectomy. We retrospectively reviewed the data of women who were diagnosed with adenomyosis and underwent adenomyomectomy through a minimally invasive approach between January 2014 and March 2018 at the CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Patient demographics and operation-related outcomes were compared between the robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups. We evaluated 43 women who underwent adenomyomectomy through a minimally invasive approach (21 underwent a laparoscopic and 22 underwent a robotic adenomyomectomy). All 22 women who had originally been scheduled to undergo robotic adenomyomectomy could successfully undergo the robotic surgery without requiring conversion to laparotomy and/or serious complications. No statistically significant differences in patient demographics were observed between the robotic and the laparoscopic surgery groups. No significant intergroup difference was observed in the operative time, estimated blood loss, weight of the resected nodule, and length of hospitalization (160.0 vs 212.5 min, P = .106; 500.0 vs 300.0 mL, P = .309; 60.0 vs 70.0 g, P = .932; and 5.0 vs 6.0 days, P = .277). No serious perioperative complications were observed in either group. Robotic adenomyomectomy is feasible for women with adenomyosis. Surgical outcomes of robotic adenomyomectomy were comparable to those of a laparoscopic approach. There was, however, no superiority of robotic adenomyomectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. Further multicenter prospective studies using standardized surgical procedures are needed to confirm the conclusion of this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.