No abstract

The air-booster vacuum preloading method has been applied to slurry ground improvement. It is based on the conventional vacuum preloading method but with an additional injection of pressurised air into the soil via pre-installed conductors. The drainage effect of air-booster vacuum preloading has been demonstrated by past studies; however, direct observations of the real-time behaviour of slurries subjected to boosted air remain lacking. This study used a combined monitoring technique that included particle image velocimetry, pore water/air pressure gauges, a vortex flowmeter and an electronic balance to conduct a laboratory test of air-booster vacuum consolidation of dredged slurry. The tests allowed analyses of (1) the real-time displacement field of the slurry, (2) the pressure–flux relationship of the pressurised air, and (3) the pore water pressure responses during air boosting. The first aspect allowed direct observation of small-crack initialisation and propagation during pressurisation; while the latter two confirmed the crack initiation based on drops in air and pore water pressures. The measured crack initiation pressure was verified by comparison with theoretical predictions. The results demonstrate that pressurised air induces cracks in soil, which promote the drainage consolidation of dredged slurry.

A field test was conducted on vacuum treatment effects of a dredged slurry ground considering three PVD spacing, i.e., 700, 800, and 900 mm. The settlement and the pore water pressure dissipation were measured during the treatment period. As expected, the consolidation rate associated with closer PVD spacing case is higher than that of the larger spacing case. However, it is observed that the final and stable values of the settlement and the pore pressure dissipation of the close spacing case (e.g., 700 mm) are about 17% higher than the case of larger PVD spacing (e.g., 900 mm). The differences imply that enlarging the PVD spacing not only impedes the consolidation rate but also decreases the vacuum pressure in slurry. Numerical models incorporating the vacuum pressure attenuation effect and the clogging effect were established to reproduce the vacuum treatment process under the three PVD spacing. Good comparisons between the numerical and test results can be obtained given a proper account of vacuum attenuation and the clogging effect along the PVD depth. The comparison clarifies that, for vacuum treatment of slurry ground, the PVD spacing should be determined by due considerations both on the desired consolidation rate and on the pore water pressure that needs to be dissipated.