A biosimilar is a copy of an approved biological medicine whose patent protections have expired. Biosimilars of antibodies to tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) are becoming important in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The first one introduced commercially is an infliximab biosimilar. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of anti-TNFα biosimilars. The literature on biosimilars of monoclonal anti-TNFα antibodies was reviewed, including their manufacture and approval pathways, concerns about efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, extrapolation, switching and labelling. Previous experience with biosimilars of epoetin and other growth factors was also reviewed. The infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 was the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody registered for the treatment of IBD. The major advantage of biosimilars is the reduced cost of therapy. Concerns have arisen, however, about the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in IBD, the extrapolation of results from rheumatologic trials to IBD and the free interchangeability of CT-P13 with infliximab. Experience with simple peptide biosimilars, such as epoetins and growth factors, has generally been positive, with these biosimilars having similar efficacy and safety as the original products, although immunogenicity remains a major concern. Upcoming postregistration studies will address concerns on biosimilars in IBD, including their efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, switching and interchangeability. Biosimilars active against the same epitopes, but with improved pharmacokinetic properties that enhance their efficacy and/or safety, may be the next stage in the development of biosimilars. Anti-TNFα biosimilars represent promising new treatment options for patients with IBD. However, data on their efficacy and safety in IBD are needed.

The prevalence of low BMD was 55%. Duration of disease was the only independent predictor of low BMD. The BMDL was reduced by high cumulative dose of CS and improved by combined anti-TNFα/AZA therapy. The supplementation with recommended doses of VD and Ca had no effect on BMDL.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Relapse rates after discontinuing anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) therapy of infl ammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in deep remission are poorly understood. This prospective singlecenter open-label study evaluated the relapse rates of IBD patients after stopping anti-TNFα therapy. METHODS: All IBD patients who were in clinical remission and stopped anti-TNFα therapy in 2011-2013 and were followed up for at least 12 months were enrolled. The "Ultradeep" patients were in calprotectin-negative (<50 ng/g) deep remission for at least six months and ceased anti-TNFα therapy on physician recommendations. The "clinical" patients were in clinical but not deep remission and ceased anti-TNFα therapy for other reasons. Relapse rates were assessed and relapse risk factors identifi ed. RESULTS: One year after stopping, 27 % and 27 % of the Ultradeep (n = 11) and Clinical (n = 11) patients relapsed, respectively. Two years after stopping, 57 % and 62 % relapsed, respectively (p = 0.89). All relapsed patients who underwent retreatment with anti-TNFα therap y re-entered remission. Male sex was a signifi cant risk factor for relapse (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that even highly selected IBD patients who lack clinical, endoscopic or laboratory signs of disease activity have a relatively high relapse rate in the follow-up period after ceasing anti-TNFα therapy (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 24). Text in PDF www.elis.sk.

No abstract