The steep rise of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated complications go along with mounting evidence of clinically important sex and gender differences. T2DM is more frequently diagnosed at lower age and body mass index in men; however, the most prominent risk factor, which is obesity, is more common in women. Generally, large sex-ratio differences across countries are observed. Diversities in biology, culture, lifestyle, environment, and socioeconomic status impact differences between males and females in predisposition, development, and clinical presentation. Genetic effects and epigenetic mechanisms, nutritional factors and sedentary lifestyle affect risk and complications differently in both sexes. Furthermore, sex hormones have a great impact on energy metabolism, body composition, vascular function, and inflammatory responses. Thus, endocrine imbalances relate to unfavorable cardiometabolic traits, observable in women with androgen excess or men with hypogonadism. Both biological and psychosocial factors are responsible for sex and gender differences in diabetes risk and outcome. Overall, psychosocial stress appears to have greater impact on women rather than on men. In addition, women have greater increases of cardiovascular risk, myocardial infarction, and stroke mortality than men, compared with nondiabetic subjects. However, when dialysis therapy is initiated, mortality is comparable in both males and females. Diabetes appears to attenuate the protective effect of the female sex in the development of cardiac diseases and nephropathy. Endocrine and behavioral factors are involved in gender inequalities and affect the outcome. More research regarding sex-dimorphic pathophysiological mechanisms of T2DM and its complications could contribute to more personalized diabetes care in the future and would thus promote more awareness in terms of sex- and gender-specific risk factors.

The DALI Lifestyle Study Context: Lifestyle approaches for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have produced mixed results. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three lifestyle interventions (Healthy eating (HE), Physical activity (PA) and both HE and PA (HE+PA)) with usual care (UC) in reducing GDM risk. Design: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial 2012-2014: The Dali Lifestyle Study Setting: Antenatal clinics across 11 centres in 9 European countries Patients: Consecutive pregnant women <20 weeks gestation with a BMI≥29 kg/m 2 and without GDM by IADPSG criteria (n=436).Intervention: Women were randomized, stratified by site, to Control, HE, PA or HE+PA. Women received 5 face-to-face and up to 4 telephone coaching sessions, based on the principles of motivational interviewing. Gestational weight gain (GWG) <5kg was targeted. Coaches received standardized training and an intervention toolkit tailored to their culture/language. Main outcome measures: GWG at 35-37 weeks, fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR) at 24-28 weeks. Results: We randomized 108 women to HE&PA, 113 to HE, 110 to PA and 105 to UC. In the HE+PA group, but not HE or PA alone, women achieved substantially less GWG than controls by 35-37 weeks . Despite this reduction there were no improvements in fasting or post-load glucose or,insulin concentrations or HOMA-IR. Birthweight, large and small for gestational age rates were similar. Copyright 2016 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016 Conclusions: The combined HE+PA intervention was able to limit GWG but did not reduce fasting glycaemia. Lifestyle change alone is unlikely to prevent GDM among women with a BMI≥29 kg/m 2 .PRECIS: We studied pregnant women in a large European multi-centre RCT of physical activity and/or healthy eating and found no effect on GDM risk in spite of significant gestational weight gain limitation INTRODUCTIONGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), high pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are independently associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, including macrosomia, operative delivery and shoulder dystocia (1). In GDM, such complications have a continuous relationship with maternal glucose concentrations during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (2). With the increasing prevalence of obesity in pregnancy and GDM (3), it has become increasingly important to develop evidence based clinical interventions that prevent the development of GDM and minimise excess GWG. The development of type 2 diabetes through intensive lifestyle interventions can be reduced by 58% over 4 years in non-pregnant women who have previously had GDM (4). However, whether GDM can be prevented through antenatal lifestyle interventions, even with limitation in excess GWG, is disputed (5). RCTs have provided variable evidence that lifestyle interventions 'work' (6); likely because of different intervention protocols and study populations. Furthermore, at the moment, no studies are available that assessed, ...

Background Gestational diabetes mellitus is a potentially serious condition that affects many pregnancies and its prevalence is increasing. Evidence suggests early detection and treatment improves outcomes, but this is hampered by continued disagreement and inconsistency regarding many aspects of its diagnosis.

BackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasing problem world-wide. Lifestyle interventions and/or vitamin D supplementation might help prevent GDM in some women.Methods/designPregnant women at risk of GDM (BMI≥29 (kg/m2)) from 9 European countries will be invited to participate and consent obtained before 19+6 weeks of gestation. After giving informed consent, women without GDM will be included (based on IADPSG criteria: fasting glucose<5.1mmol; 1 hour glucose <10.0 mmol; 2 hour glucose <8.5 mmol) and randomized to one of the 8 intervention arms using a 2×(2×2) factorial design: (1) healthy eating (HE), 2) physical activity (PA), 3) HE+PA, 4) control, 5) HE+PA+vitamin D, 6) HE+PA+placebo, 7) vitamin D alone, 8) placebo alone), pre-stratified for each site. In total, 880 women will be included with 110 women allocated to each arm. Between entry and 35 weeks of gestation, women allocated to a lifestyle intervention will receive 5 face-to-face, and 4 telephone coaching sessions, based on the principles of motivational interviewing. The lifestyle intervention includes a discussion about the risks of GDM, a weight gain target <5kg and either 7 healthy eating ‘messages’ and/or 5 physical activity ‘messages’ depending on randomization. Fidelity is monitored by the use of a personal digital assistance (PDA) system. Participants randomized to the vitamin D intervention receive either 1600 IU vitamin D or placebo for daily intake until delivery. Data is collected at baseline measurement, at 24–28 weeks, 35–37 weeks of gestation and after delivery. Primary outcome measures are gestational weight gain, fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity, with a range of obstetric secondary outcome measures including birth weight.DiscussionDALI is a unique Europe-wide randomised controlled trial, which will gain insight into preventive measures against the development of GDM in overweight and obese women.Trial registrationISRCTN70595832

No abstract