Objective The aim of this study was to develop and validate a patient‐reported outcome measure to evaluate body image concerns in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Methods Items were created using a combination of deductive (eg, US Food and Drug Administration Qualification of Clinical Outcome Assessments, literature review) and inductive approaches (eg, subject matter experts, HNC patients). Items were translated for use in both Canadian English and Canadian French using back‐translation. A two‐step empirical validation process using the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) was conducted with 224 and 258 HNC patients, respectively, having undergone disfiguring surgery within the past 3 years. Results Analyses suggest two subscales for MBIS‐HNC: social discomfort (10 items) and negative self‐image (11 items). The McGill Body Image Concerns Scale–Head and Neck Cancer (MBIS‐HNC) is reliable with high internal consistency (0.98), high test‐retest reliability over a two‐week period (ICC = 0.88), moderate to high convergent validity (range r = 0.43‐0.81), and divergent validity (range r = 0.12‐0.15). RMT was used in addition to CTT. Disordered thresholds led to the modification of the number of response options, and items were deleted based on differential item functioning and high local dependency. Unidimensionality of both subscales and supporting a total score was confirmed. The measure was however characterized by the presence of an important floor effect, confirmed with poor targeting as demonstrated by the person‐item threshold distribution. Conclusion Evidence gathered from our theory‐driven validation study using CTT and RMT provides practitioners and researchers with a useful and easy to use self‐report measure.

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection. However, morbidity and mortality rates are variable among countries. To date, there are no published reports that document outcomes of SCD patients with COVID-19 in Canada. Methods: A web-based registry was implemented in June 2020 capturing outcomes of SCD patients with COVID-19 from March 2020 to April 2022 and comparing them to the general population of Quebec, Canada. Results: After 24 months of the pandemic, 185 SCD patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the registry. Overall, the population was young (median age 12 years old) and had few comorbidities. No deaths were reported. Risk of hospitalization and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) because of COVID-19 was higher in patients with SCD than in the general population (relative risks (RR) 5.15 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.84–6.91), p ˂ 0.001 and 4.56 (95% CI 2.09–9.93) p ˂ 0.001). A history of arterial hypertension or acute chest syndrome in the past 12 months was associated with a higher risk of severe disease (RR = 3.06 (95% CI 1.85–5.06) p = 0.008 and 2.27 (95% CI 1.35–3.83) p = 0.01). Hospitalized patients had lower hemoglobin F than non-hospitalized patients (12% vs. 17%, p = 0.02). For those who had access to vaccination at the time of infection, 25 out of 26 patients were adequately vaccinated and had mild disease. Conclusions: The SCD population is at higher risk of severe disease than the general population. However, we report favorable outcomes as no deaths occurred. Registries will continue to be critical to document the impact of novel COVID-19 specific therapy and vaccines for the SCD population.

Introduction Approximately 1500 people live with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the province of Quebec, Canada. Public health has recognized these patients as immunocompromised. SCD patients may be at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection due to their underlying pro-inflammatory and thrombogenic state, splenic dysfunction and secondary organopathies. Descriptions about disease severity and mortality rates in SCD vary widely. From the SECURE-SCD registry, Mucalo et al. recently reported a 0.3% and 4.7% mortality rate in children and adults, respectively. In the French registry, Arlet and colleagues reported a 2.4% death rate among those hospitalized with COVID-19 and SCD, not different from the general population. As a result, the COVID-19 morbidity and mortality rates among the SCD population remain uncertain. Objectives The primary objectives of our study are to describe the epidemiology, baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of SCD patients with COVID-19 infection in the province of Quebec. In addition, we aim to identify risk factors for hospitalization and severe forms of COVID-19. Methods We built a web-based SCD-COVID-19 registry regrouping 7 adult and 4 paediatric tertiary care hospitals in the province of Quebec in June 2020. All SCD patients with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR test were included in the study. We compared the prevalence of infection and hospitalization rates of SCD patients to the general population of Quebec using the epidemiological data from the INSPQ (National Institute of Public Health of Quebec) public database. We retrospectively analyzed data included between March 11, 2020 to March 1, 2021. Relative risk was calculated using bilateral association measures (exact fisher, mid-p or chi-squared tests, as appropriate) to compare the incidence of infection and hospitalization of SCD patients to the population of Quebec and to assess risk factors of hospitalization among SCD patients. Results During the first 12 months of the pandemic, 74 patients were included in the registry. The male to female ratio was 1:1.12. Median age was 23 years, ranging from 8 months to 68 years old. SS-Sbeta 0 genotypes were present in 51% of cases, while 49% were SC or Sbeta +. The majority of patients were on disease modifying therapy: 54% were on hydroxyurea and 17.5% on exchange transfusion therapy. The incidence of reported COVID-19 infection was significantly higher in SCD patients compared to the general population (4.9% vs. 3.5% p=0,002) (Table 1). Even more strikingly, SCD had rate of hospitalization 10-times greater than the general population (33.8 vs 3.2%, p<0,001). Nevertheless, the risk of admission to the intensive care unit was similar between SCD patients and the general population (24.0% vs. 24.1%, p=0.99). No death was recorded amongst SCD patients with COVID-19 compared to a death rate in the general population in Quebec of less than 70 years old of 48-78 for 100 000 infections (male-female). A history of acute chest syndrome (ACS) in the last year (OR 2.6 [1.5-4.6], p=0.04) and arterial hypertension (OR 3.3 [2.3-4.8], p=0.01) were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (Table 2). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant association with age, sex, genotype, ABO blood group, baseline SCD therapy, or other comorbidities (chronic renal disease, obesity, pulmonary hypertension, chronic lung disease and previous admission to ICU) in our cohort. Conclusions Similar to other reports, we found that SCD patients were at much greater risk of hospitalization compared to the general population. We however found no increased risk of mortality or disease complication. This contrasts with results from other registries. A history of ACS and hypertension were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization. Whether social determinants of health could explain some of the outcome variability between different countries merit further investigation. Furthermore, we believe that registries are critical to monitor the impact of preventive measures. As vaccination is ongoing, it will be important to consider its impact on hospitalization and death rate among SCD population. Recruitment to the registry is ongoing and updated data will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Soulieres: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Forté: Novartis: Honoraria; Canadian Hematology Society: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

No abstract

Cancers of the head and ne¬ck and their treatment can cause disfigurement and loss of functioning, with a profound negative impact on the person’s self-image and psychosocial wellbeing. This can lead to experiences of shame and stigma, which are important targets for psychosocial interventions. Accurate measurement and identification of these problems enables clinicians to offer appropriate interventions and monitor patients’ progress. This study aimed to validate the Canadian version of the Shame and Stigma Scale (SSS) among French and English speaking head and neck cancer patients. Data from 258 patients from two major Canadian hospitals was analysed. The existing 4-factor structure of the SSS was supported, with the following subscales: Shame with Appearance, Sense of Stigma, Regret, and Social/Speech Concerns. The Canadian SSS showed adequate convergent and divergent validity and test-retest reliability. Rasch analysis suggested scale improvement by removing two misfitting item and two items with differential functioning between French and English speaking patients. The final 16-item scale version had adequate fit to the Rasch model. The SSS provides more accurate measures for people with high levels of shame and stigma, and thus has utility in identifying patients with more severe symptoms who may be in need of psychosocial interventions.