Increased epicardial adiponectin is associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm following cardiac surgery. This reinforces the inflammatory hypothesis in the pathogenesis of postoperative AF and may represent a novel therapeutic target for its effective prevention.

Both genetic and haemodynamic theories explain the aetiology, progression and optimal management of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. In recent years, the haemodynamic theory has been explored with the help of magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. The objective of this review was to summarize the findings of these investigations with focus on the blood flow pattern and associated variables, including flow eccentricity, helicity, flow displacement, cusp opening angle, systolic flow angle, wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index. A structured literature review was performed from January 1990 to January 2018 and revealed the following 3 main findings: (i) the bicuspid aortic valve is associated with flow eccentricity and helicity in the ascending aorta compared to healthy and diseased tricuspid aortic valve, (ii) flow displacement is easier to obtain than WSS and has been shown to correlate with valve morphology and type of aortopathy and (iii) the stenotic bicuspid aortic valve is associated with elevated WSS along the greater curvature of the ascending aorta, where aortic dilatation and aortic wall thinning are commonly found. We conclude that new haemodynamic variables should complement ascending aorta diameter as an indicator for disease progression and the type and timing of intervention. WSS describes the force that blood flow exerts on the vessel wall as a function of viscosity and geometry of the vessel, making it a potentially more reliable marker of disease progression.

Using the IAA, we identified a significant proportion of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms who are at increased risk of aortic complications, despite current aortic guidelines not endorsing surgical intervention in this group. Our data suggests the IAA may be useful in preoperative risk evaluation and as a criterion for surgery.

Prophylactic arch replacement during aortic root and ascending aortic surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valve is not supported. Our data do not support long-term surveillance of the rest of the aorta in this population.

Optimal thromboprophylaxis following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains controversial. The main objective, which is the effective prevention of central nervous or peripheral embolic events, especially in the early postoperative period, will have to be weighed against the haemorrhagic risk that is associated with the utilization of different antithrombotic regimes. Most governing bodies in cardiovascular medicine have issued recommendations on thromboprophylaxis after the surgical implantation of aortic bioprostheses. However, the level of evidence to support these recommendations remains low, largely due to the inherent limitations of conducting appropriately randomized and adequately powered clinical research in this area. It is apparent from the recent surveys and large registries that there is a great variability in antithrombotic practice at an institutional or individual-clinician level reflecting this controversy and the lack of robust evidence. While organizational, financial or conceptual limitations could hinder the conduct and availability of conclusive research on optimal thromboprophylaxis after aortic bioprosthesis, it is imperative that all evidence is presented in a systematic way in order to assist the decision-making for the modern clinician. In this review, we provide an outline of the current recommendations for thromboprophylaxis, followed by a comprehensive and analytical presentation of all comparative studies examining anticoagulation vs. antiplatelet therapy after bioprosthetic AVR.