In 2013, Matthew Kirschenbaum advocated for increased collaboration between digital archivists and digital humanities specialists to make the most out of borndigital archives. Since then, researchers and archivists have experimented with innovative interfaces for access to writer's archives that emerge from individual research cultures and practices. Simultaneously, archives such as the British Archive for Contemporary Writing at the University of East Anglia are beginning to collect the work of authors who work in inventive digital ways. This article will therefore explore the following question: how might archivists, authors, and researchers profitably collaborate to explore the nature of creativity in the borndigital archive, so that both digital preservation and digital scholarship take place? In doing so, we look to the complementary fields of genetic criticism and digital humanities to inform the development of archival tools as 'hermeneutical instruments.' We will explore how such instruments might allow us to read horizontally across archival strata, building on an 'esthetic of the possible' to develop a 'jouer avec les fonds,' supported through collaboration between researchers, archivists and writers. Finally, we consider how this approach challenges archival practices, and propose forms of collaboration that might address both archival practice and emerging forms of scholarship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.