BackgroundEpidemiologic evidence for a serum cholesterol-prostate cancer link is mixed. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is positively correlated with cholesterol, potentially increasing PSA-driven biopsy recommendations in men with high cholesterol, though biopsy compliance may be lower in men with comorbid conditions. These potential biases may affect PSA-driven biopsy rates and subsequent prostate cancer detection in men with high serum cholesterol. Our objective was to test the association between serum cholesterol and prostate cancer risk in men receiving PSA-independent, study-mandated prostate biopsies.MethodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from 4,974 non-statin users in REDUCE, a randomized trial in men with elevated PSA and a negative baseline biopsy. Men underwent 2- and 4-year trial-mandated prostate biopsies. Associations between baseline serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and prostate cancer risk, overall and by Gleason grade (<7 vs. ≥7), were examined using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsHigh total serum cholesterol was associated with an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer diagnosis (ORper10mg/dl 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.09; p=0.048), but cholesterol was unrelated to either overall or low-grade prostate cancer risk (p-values>0.185). There was no association between serum LDL and overall, low- or high-grade prostate cancer risk (p-values>0.137). In contrast, elevated serum HDL was associated with increased risk of both overall (ORper10mg/dl 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.16; p=0.033) and high-grade prostate cancer (ORper10mg/dl 1.14; 95% CI 1.01-1.28; p=0.034).ConclusionsIn REDUCE, where all men received PSA-independent, trial-mandated biopsies thus ensuring complete prostate cancer ascertainment, high total serum cholesterol and high HDL were associated with increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer, supporting a cholesterol-prostate cancer link.

Background: Ischemia is thought to contribute to benign ureteroenteric stricture (UES) after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (RCUD). Our institution adopted the use of ureteral perfusion assessment during all RCUDs using real-time indocyanine green angiography using the SPY fluorescence imaging platform (Stryker Corp., Kalamazoo, MI, USA). This guides the location of ureteral transection prior to ureteroenteric anastomosis. We sought to compare UES rates before and after adoption of SPY. Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken for the first 47 consecutive cases of RCUD using SPY as well as the previous 47 consecutive cases, which were performed without SPY. Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare benign UES rates and the length of ureter excised during anastomosis. A p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Median follow up was 12.0 months for SPY cases and 24.3 months for non-SPY cases. The UES rate for SPY RCUDs was 0% (0/93 ureters) compared with 7.5% (7/93 ureters) for non-SPY RCUDs ( p = 0.01). Amongst SPY RCUDs, 86 ureters had no hydronephrosis and 7 had mild hydronephrosis with reflux on loopogram. A total of 34.4% of ureters (32/93) had poor distal perfusion, requiring a more proximal anastomosis. The median length excised for ureters with poor distal perfusion was 3.8 cm, compared with 2.2 cm for ureters with good distal perfusion ( p < 0.0001). No complications attributable to the use of SPY were noted. Conclusion: Use of SPY to assess ureteral perfusion was associated with a decrease in the UES rate after RCUD. A total of 34.4% of ureters demonstrated poor distal perfusion, requiring a significantly more proximal ureteroenteric anastomosis.

In our series of 187 intravesical injections for OAB, the rate of postprocedure urinary retention requiring catheterization was only 1.6%. This low rate can be attributed to less rigorous criteria for CIC initiation than those applied in previous studies. While important to counsel patients on the risk of retention, patients can be reassured that the actual rate of CIC is low.

BackgroundUterine power morcellation, where the uterus is shred into smaller pieces, is a widely used technique for removal of uterine specimens in patients undergoing minimally invasive abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy. Complications related to power morcellation of uterine specimens led to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communications in 2014 ultimately recommending against the use of power morcellation for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy. Subsequently, practitioners drastically decreased the use of morcellation.ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the effect of increased patient awareness on the decrease in use of the morcellator. Google Trends is a public tool that provides data on temporal patterns of search terms, and we correlated this data with the timing of the FDA communication.MethodsWeekly relative search volume (RSV) was obtained from Google Trends using the term “morcellation.” Higher RSV corresponds to increases in weekly search volume. Search volumes were divided into 3 groups: the 2 years prior to the FDA communication, a 1-year period following, and thereafter, with the distribution of the weekly RSV over the 3 periods tested using 1-way analysis of variance. Additionally, we analyzed the total number of websites containing the term “morcellation” over this time.ResultsThe mean RSV prior to the FDA communication was 12.0 (SD 15.8), with the RSV being 60.3 (SD 24.7) in the 1-year after and 19.3 (SD 5.2) thereafter (P<.001). The mean number of webpages containing the term “morcellation” in 2011 was 10,800, rising to 18,800 during 2014 and 36,200 in 2017.ConclusionsGoogle search activity about morcellation of uterine specimens increased significantly after the FDA communications. This trend indicates an increased public awareness regarding morcellation and its complications. More extensive preoperative counseling and alteration of surgical technique and clinician practice may be necessary.

Purpose Despite the routine use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) for treatment of erectile dysfunction, their role in prostate cancer (PC) chemoprevention remains unclear with only a few studies exploring the link between PDE-5i use and PC. We tested the association between PDE-5i use and PC risk in the REDUCE study. Materials & Methods REDUCE was a four-year multi-center study testing the effect of daily dutasteride on PC risk in men with a PSA of 2.5 to 10.0 ng/mL and a negative biopsy, with men undergoing study-mandated biopsies at 2- and 4-years. The association between PDE-5i use and overall PC risk and disease grade (Gleason 2–6 and 7–10) was examined using adjusted logistic and multinomial regression analysis. Secondary analysis was performed exploring the association between PDE-5i use and PC risk in North American men given the significantly higher use of PDE-5i among these subjects. Results PDE-5i inhibitor use was not associated with PC diagnosis (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.68–1.20, p=0.476) or low- (OR=0.93, 95%CI 0.67–1.27, p=0.632) or high-grade disease (OR=0.85, 95%CI 0.51–1.39, p=0.508). An inverse trend was seen between PDE-5i use and PC diagnosis in North American men, but was not statistically significant (OR=0.67, 95%CI 0.42–1.07, p=0.091). Conclusions PDE-5i use was not associated with decreased PC diagnosis in post-hoc analysis of the REDUCE study. In North American men, who had a much higher baseline use of PDE-5i, use was associated with an inverse trend of PC diagnosis that approached, but did not reach, statistical significance.