IntroductionThe rising economic burden of cancer on healthcare system and patients in India has led to the increased demand for evidence in order to inform policy decisions such as drug price regulation, setting reimbursement package rates under publicly financed health insurance schemes and prioritising available resources to maximise value of investments in health. Economic evaluations are an integral component of this important evidence. Lack of existing evidence on healthcare costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) makes conducting economic evaluations a very challenging task. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a national database for health expenditure and HRQOL for cancer.Methods and analysisThe present study proposes to develop a National Cancer Database for Cost and Quality of Life (CaDCQoL) in India. The healthcare costs will be estimated using a patient perspective. A cross-sectional study will be conducted to assess the direct out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), indirect cost and HRQOL among cancer patients who will be recruited at seven leading cancer centres from six states in India. Mean OOPE and HRQOL scores will be estimated by cancer site, stage of disease and type of treatment. Economic impact of cancer care on household financial risk protection will be assessed by estimating prevalence of catastrophic health expenditures and impoverishment. The national database would serve as a unique open access data repository to derive estimates of cancer-related OOPE and HRQOL. These estimates would be useful in conducting future cost-effectiveness analyses of management strategies for value-based cancer care.Ethics and disseminationApproval was granted by Institutional Ethics Committee vide letter no. PGI/IEC-03/2020-1565 of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented to the policymakers at national level.

Background Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of people with chronic illnesses has become extremely important as the mortality rates associated with such illnesses have decreased and survival rates have increased. Thereby, such measurements not only provide insights into physical, mental and social dimensions of patient’s health, but also allow monitoring of the results of interventions, complementing the traditional methods based on morbidity and mortality. Objective The present study was conducted to describe the HRQOL of patients suffering from Rheumatic Fever (RF) and Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD), and to identify socio-demographic and clinical factors as predictors of HRQOL. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the HRQOL among 702 RF and RHD patients using EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels instrument (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale and Time Trade off method. Mean EQ-5D-5L quality of life scores were calculated using EQ5D index value calculator across different stages of RF and RHD. Proportions of patients reporting problems in different attributes of EQ-5D-5L were calculated. The impact of socio-economic determinants on HRQOL was assessed. Results The mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores among RF, RHD and RHD with Congestive heart failure patients (CHF) were estimated as 0.952 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.929–0.975], 0.820 [95% CI: 0.799–0.842] and 0.800 [95% CI: 0.772–0.829] respectively. The most frequently reported problem among RF/RHD patients was pain/discomfort (33.8%) followed by difficulty in performing usual activities (23.9%) patients, mobility (22.7%) and anxiety/depression (22%). Patients with an annual income of less than 50,000 Indian National Rupees (INR) reported the highest EQ-5D-5L score of 0.872, followed by those in the income group of more than INR 200,000 (0.835), INR 50,000–100,000 (0.832) and INR 100,000–200,000 (0.828). Better HRQOL was reported by RHD patients (including RHD with CHF) who underwent balloon valvotomy (0.806) as compared to valve replacement surgery (0.645). Conclusion RF and RHD significantly impact the HRQOL of patients. Interventions aiming to improve HRQOL of RF/RHD patients should focus upon ameliorating pain and implementation of secondary prevention strategies for reducing the progression from ARF to RHD and prevention of RHD-related complications.

No abstract

Background Lack of data on the cost of cardiac care is an impediment to evidence-based planning, especially for determining provider payment rates under publically financed health insurance schemes. Objective This study estimates the unit costs of outpatient consultation, hospitalization, intensive care, selected surgical procedures and diagnostics for providing cardiac care for valvular heart disease at a tertiary hospital in India. Methods We undertook an economic costing of cardiac care using both patient and health system perspectives. For the health system costs, a bottom-up costing methodology was used. Data on all resources (capital and recurrent) utilized for the delivery of cardiac care services for valvular heart disease for 1 year were collected. Data on out-of-pocket expenditures was collected from 100 cardiac patients who underwent valve replacement and balloon valvotomy procedures. All estimated costs represent the year 2016–2017. Results The health system cost of an outpatient cardiac consultation was estimated as 182.4 Indian rupees (INR) (US$2.8) and INR334.8 (US$5.2) in the cardiology, and cardio-thoracic and vascular surgery (CTVS) departments, respectively. The cost of hospitalization per bed-day in cardiology, CTVS and the intensive care unit (ICU) was INR1040 (US$16), INR3853 (US$60) and INR12,635 (US$197), respectively. The median out-of-pocket expenditure for valve replacement surgery using mechanical and bio-prosthetic valves was estimated to be INR107,800 (US$1684) and INR154,000 (US$2406), respectively, and for balloon valvotomy was estimated to be INR14,456 (US$367). Overall package cost per mechanical and bio-prosthetic single valve replacement surgery and balloon valvotomy procedure was estimated as INR127,919 (US$1999), INR148,919 (US$2372) and INR14,456 (US$226), respectively. Conclusion Our findings are useful for planning expansion of public sector cardiac care services, developing package rates for publically financed insurance schemes in India and for undertaking research on cost effectiveness of various models of cardiac care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0123-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract