This report describes the cytological and histological features of a leiomyosarcoma of the breast. The differential diagnosis of this rare tumour is discussed. Eleven well documented cases of leiomyosarcoma of the breast have been reported previously and details of these are included in this review.

Women with cervical smears showing borderline nuclear abnormality (BNA), or reactive changes in the form of squamous metaplasia (SM) or endocervical cell hyperplasia (ECH), were age-matched with healthy controls to determine the outcome of these conditions. No significant difference in the risk of dyskaryosis was observed in cases showing reactive changes and the controls. In contrast, there was a 23% excess of cases showing dyskaryosis in the repeat smears of cases of BNA over the controls. An odds ratio of 8.3 was obtained, showing dyskaryosis in subsequent smears after a diagnosis of BNA.

Although rare, microglandular adenosis of the breast is well recognized as a benign lesion which mimics tubular adenocarcinoma. In this paper we present a case of a complex microglandular adenosis-like lesion which was thought to be suggestive of tubular adenocarcinoma by fine needle aspiration cytology. The problem of the cytological distinction of microglandular adenosis from tubular adenocarcinoma is discussed.

Aspirate from an argyrophil carcinoma ("carcinoid") of the breast showed malignant dispersed epithelial cells. With Diff-Quik, the cytoplasm was seen to be abundant, with prominent eosinophilic granularity. The nuclei were fairly uniform, round or oval, and eccentric and had a finely stippled chromatin pattern. On histology, the tumor appeared typical for argyrophil carcinoma, and staining with Grimelius for argyrophilic granules was positive. Membrane-bound neurosecretory granules were seen on electron microscopy.

The tissue sections and preceding cervical smears of 1262 women who had colposcopic cervical biopsies were reviewed and the reports correlated. Close correlation between the cytological and histological findings, to within one histological grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), was noted in 86% of cases. However, the biopsy was negative, or contained evidence of wart virus infection only, in 24% of cases where dyskaryotic cells had been observed in the cervical smear. Of particular concern was the fact that negative histological findings were recorded in 13% of cases where the smear contained cells showing a moderate dyskaryosis and in 1.26% of cases where the smear showed severe dyskaryosis. This suggests that colposcopically directed biopsies do not always reflect the underlying pathological changes in the cervix. Management of these cases is discussed. In 45 women with a normal cervical smear prior to biopsy, histology revealed seven cases of CIN 3 and one case of invasive squamous carcinoma. This indicates that referral for colposcopy is advisable whenever there is clinical suspicion of cancer, even if the cervical smear report is normal.