A prospective, randomized study compared the hemodynamic effects of equivalent doses of five slow calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, nisoldipine, and amlodipine) in 50 patients with ischemia. After a stable control period, dose-response curves were constructed for each drug with hemodynamics measured 10 minutes after intravenous boluses. Each drug reduced mean systemic arterial pressure (P less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance index (P less than 0.01). The heart rate increased after nicardipine, nisoldipine, and amlodipine (P less than 0.01) but was unchanged after verapamil and reduced after diltiazem (P less than 0.01). The left ventricular filling pressure increased after amlodipine (P less than 0.05) and verapamil (P less than 0.01) but was unchanged with the other compounds. Cardiac index increased substantially after the dihydropyridines (P less than 0.01), with little change after verapamil or diltiazem. Cardiac double product fell only after verapamil and diltiazem. These studies provide quantitation of the comparative actions of acute intravenous calcium channel blockade in coronary disease.
1 To obtain multiple dose-response haemodynamic and radionucide data on i.v. diltiazem, 12 ischaemic patients were studied during routine catheterization. 2 At rest, following a 20 min stable control period, the effects of four doses (0.0625, 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.25 mg kg-' diltiazem at 5 min intervals) were measured in the 3-5 min following i.v. injection. The exercise effects of the cumulative 0.5 mg kg-' dosage were assessed by comparing a control and post drug period of supine bicycle exercise. 3 The increase in plasma diltiazem levels correlated linearly with the administered dose and achieved therapeutic levels. There were significant dose-related reductions in systemic arterial blood pressure and vascular resistance index; the heart rate fell and cardiac stroke index increased. The calculated double-product (heart rate x systolic blood pressure) was significantly reduced. The left ventricular filling pressures, ejection fraction and cardiac volumes were unaltered.4 During supine bicycle exercise, the systemic diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and calculated double-product were reduced without change in other parameters.5 Over the dose range 0.0625-0.5 mg kg-', diltiazem acutely increased cardiac stroke index and reduced resting heart rate. These haemodynamic data, taken together with its described coronary vasodilator activity suggest that its role in acute vasospastic angina and during angiographic procedures ought to be explored further.
The hemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous (0.05 and 0.10 mg/kg) and oral (50 and 100 mg) atenolol were compared in a randomized between-group study of 24 men within seventeen hours of an acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction; 6 subjects were evaluated in each of the four groups. Hemodynamic variables were determined over a one-hour control period, following which the randomized dose of atenolol was administered and measurements repeated at 15 (intravenous therapy only), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes. The peak hemodynamic effect was similar and independent of either the dosage or route of administration. In all groups atenolol reduced heart rate and cardiac and stroke volume indices. The pulmonary artery occluded pressure and systemic vascular resistance index were transiently increased. Mean arterial pressure was significantly reduced only in the oral group with the highest pretreatment pressure. Maximum changes developed between fifteen and thirty minutes after intravenous dosing and between two and three hours after oral dosing. However, substantial reductions in cardiac index (-0.6 L/min/m2; p less than 0.05) were already achieved at sixty minutes following oral dosing. The duration of pharmacodynamic activity was for two to three hours following intravenous and for the study duration (four to six hours) after oral dosing. These data confirm the hemodynamic safety of atenolol after acute myocardial infarction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.