BACKGROUND Given the phenotypic similarities between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)–associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (hereafter, RA-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, we hypothesized that the strongest risk factor for the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the gain-of-function MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950, would also contribute to the risk of ILD among patients with RA. METHODS Using a discovery population and multiple validation populations, we tested the association of the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 in 620 patients with RA-ILD, 614 patients with RA without ILD, and 5448 unaffected controls. RESULTS Analysis of the discovery population revealed an association of the minor allele of the MUC5B promoter variant with RA-ILD when patients with RA-ILD were compared with unaffected controls (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 5.2; P = 9.7×10−17). The MUC5B promoter variant was also significantly overrepresented among patients with RA-ILD, as compared with unaffected controls, in an analysis of the multi-ethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.2 to 7.3; P = 4.7×10−35) and in a combined analysis of the discovery population and the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8; P = 1.3×10−49). In addition, the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with an increased risk of ILD among patients with RA (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.4; P = 7.4×10−5), particularly among those with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.9 to 13.1; P = 2.5×10−6). However, no significant association with the MUC5B promoter variant was observed for the diagnosis of RA alone. CONCLUSIONS We found that the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with RA-ILD and more specifically associated with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on imaging. (Funded by Société Française de Rhumatologie and others.)

The connective tissue disorders (CTDs), also called collagen vascular diseases (CVDs), represent a heterogeneous group of immunologically mediated inflammatory disorders with a large variety of affected organs. Individuals with a CTD (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren's syndrome, polymyositis/dermatomyositis and mixed connective tissue disease) are susceptible to respiratory involvement. When the lungs are affected, an increasing mortality and morbidity in CVDs occurs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is established as a clinical corollary across the spectrum of CTDs, with an overall incidence estimated at 15%.Therefore, pivotal clinical dilemmas remain in the evaluation and management of ILD involvement in CVDs. Critical questions are the presence of fibrosis and whether the disease is clinically significant. Moreover, the clinician has to decide if treatment is warranted and which is the best therapeutic approach. The use of additional tests, such as pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography scan, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and surgical lung biopsy, deserves better discussion. The present review focuses on establishing the diagnosis of ILD in CTD, and on evaluating disease activity and prognosis. This will provide the basis for therapeutic decisions that will be discussed, including an overview of recent advances.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of heterogeneous disorders, either idiopathic or associated with injurious or inflammatory causes, in which the major site of damage is the lung interstitium. For a long time, knowledge regarding pathogenesis was trivial and there were difficulties in diagnosing and subsequently treating these diseases.During the past decade, however, there has been an impressive development in the field of ILDs. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the most common and fatal form of ILD, was initially believed to be due to an inflammatory response to unknown lung injury, whereas nowadays it is believed to be the result of multiple injuries at different sites of the lung followed by aberrant repair.The integration of clinical, radiological and histological data, namely a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, has provided grounds for a more accurate diagnosis of ILDs, and helped the identification of different entities and development of different therapeutic approaches. However, because of the complexity of ILDs, even this approach may fail to establish a confident diagnosis.How should the clinician behave in this case and what are the pitfalls of the MDT approach? In addition, since diagnosis is the major predictor of prognosis, are there any other tools available to predict prognosis?

Treatment benefits consist of the prevention of progression and are largely confined to patients with extensive pulmonary fibrosis. Historical algorithms for the identification of alveolitis, using computed tomography and bronchoalveolar lavage, are inaccurate and do not identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment. Accurate prognostic evaluation by staging the severity of lung disease remains central to management and will be a major focus of future studies.