No abstract

No abstract

This article takes up Donna Haraway's discussion of 'diffraction' as a remedial to the literal self-centredness of the figure of reflection, in order to propose an alternative learning objective for creative writing curricula. There, currently, 'reflective learning' is a common if implicit objective, often manifesting in the form of journal-keeping and some kinds of writing exercises, while a capacity for 'reflection' can be seen at least bureaucratically to validate the existence per se of university writing programs (Green & Williams 2018). In the educational literature, self-reflexive contemplation of one's own experiences is said to be preliminary to the achievement of deep, life-long and transformative knowledge (Ryan & Ryan 2012). But, from a posthumanist standpoint, the discourse around reflection in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning appears ideologically committed to a subjectivity that is integral, insular and (thus) humanist, and constitutionally resistant to transformation. Here, I make use of the post-secondary educational literature on 'object-based learning' (OBL) to suggest that students' touching of objects can be conducive to diffractive rather than reflective learningthat is, conducive to learning that avoids the humanist atomisation of subject from object and instead entails establishing one's interconnectedness with environments. To this end, I propose a way to frame OBL activities as developing a reciprocal relationship between writing subjects and objects of study, in which students situate their writing not as a reflection on/of objects 'out there' in the world, but rather as an active and literal co-creation of the self-as-world.