Ecological restoration programs in dynamic coastal environments can benefit from adaptive management, including an iterative process for identifying and addressing critical uncertainties. We highlight key developments under the three pillars that have increased the rate of restoration by the Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program (CEERP) over 20 years: science, coordination, and management. We show how such programs can be institutionalized to ensure that estuary ecosystems are better understood, conserved, and restored. The principal conservation effort under CEERP is to reconnect historical floodplain wetlands to the mainstem. The program also supports other restoration actions that demonstrate a high potential to benefit ecosystem function and endangered salmon populations; however, there is greater uncertainty regarding these less-utilized techniques. Through adaptive management, we address technical uncertainty regarding benefits to the environmental resource and programmatic uncertainty pertaining to decision-making. Here, we examine three periods of CEERP growth to establish how complementary research and restoration actions have improved program outcomes over time. We highlight the tools and processes that were developed and integrated into the program to refine program strategy, improve project design, and maximize ecological benefits. CEERP supported 77 restoration projects and reconnected over 7,000 acres of floodplain habitat to the lower Columbia River between 2004 and 2021. Building on these successes, we outline current plans to better engage landowners and local communities, solicit new project types, and maintain enough flexibility within the program to adapt to new priorities.

To increase survival of diverse Columbia River salmon populations and life history types, we developed a landscape framework for habitat restoration to assess and reduce habitat fragmentation, and thereby improve habitat functions. For the last two decades, aquatic habitat has been restored in the Columbia River Estuary (U.S.A.) to aid salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus spp.) listed under the Endangered Species Act. The 234-km long estuary exhibits tidal to fluvial gradients in hydrology, sedimentology, and ecology, punctuated by large tributary rivers, cities, and land uses; it has lost two-thirds of its historical floodplains and wetlands to development. Since 2009, an expert panel has assessed potential benefits of proposed restoration projects based on habitat "opportunity" (accessibility to juvenile salmon) and "capacity" (attributes supporting salmon production). These criteria favored large restoration projects located near the mainstem river, but they were insufficient for assessing a project's benefits due to geographic location relative to existing habitat. Our landscape framework applies the concept of restoring and conserving habitat "stepping stones" of appropriate size and location to benefit juvenile salmon growth and survival throughout their estuary residency and migration. We also compared contemporary and historical landscape conditions to identify restoration priorities. We improved our restoration project assessments by evaluating each project's benefits to juvenile salmon according to its location in the estuary relative to other habitat. Our approach operationalizes landscape ecology-based decisions within the Columbia River Estuary for migratory salmon and is applicable to other large estuary systems with migratory aquatic species.