Only 1.2% of our outpatients with diabetes on primary care level showed high diabetes-related distress. Higher rates in the current literature are probably due to not investigating on primary care level. Guidelines should consider this.

No abstract

Objective The aim of this longitudinal study was to assess outcomes before and one year after participation in a structured inpatient intervention including participation in an education programme for people with type 2 diabetes. Methods In 2014, 81 individuals, who were admitted to optimise insulin therapy, participated in a structured inpatient intervention and were invited to participate in a follow-up visit after one year. Results Seventy participants (46.9% female, age 68.3 y, diabetes duration 17.9 y, HbA1c 9.7%/82.5 mmol/mol) were followed-up after 1.2 y (3 died by non-diabetic causes, 8 declined/were not available). HbA1c decreased by 1.1% (p<0.001) without change of insulin dose (79.7 vs. 79.3 IU, n.s.) or BMI (33.6 vs. 33.8 kg/m2, n.s.). 5 people admitted because of severe hypoglycaemia (one person with 5 episodes and 4 with one episode in the year prior to participation) did not experience another event in the evaluation period, nor did anyone in the rest of the cohort (frequency of severe hypoglycaemia 0.12 events/year before and 0.0 after intervention). Conclusions In people admitted for optimising insulin therapy or severe hypoglycaemia, metabolic control improved substantially and frequency of severe hypoglycaemia was significantly reduced after participation in a structured inpatient intervention. Reasons could be motivational and better adapted eating habits, tailoring individual therapy solutions and deescalating diabetes therapy in people after severe hypoglycaemia.

Objective Several studies evaluated inpatient diabetes teaching and treatment programmes (DTTP) in diabetes type 1 (DM1) many years ago, but in these studies insulin treatment was not yet intensified before the DTTP. Today, most patients are already on intensified insulin treatment before entering a DTTP. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the outcome one year after participation in an inpatient intervention including a DTTP in a longitudinal study. Methods 109 patients participated in an inpatient intervention in 2014. All individuals were invited to participate in an outpatient follow-up visit after one year. Results Ninety participants (52.2% female, age 48.0 y, diabetes duration 19.1 y, 31.1% CSII, HbA1c 7.9% / 63.3 mmol/mol) were followed-up after 1.2±0.3 y [1 died, 18 declined / were not available]. 83 / 90 individuals participated to optimise diabetes therapy, 7 / 90 had newly-diagnosed DM1. In the optimisation group, HbA1c decreased by 0.4% (p=0.009) without change of insulin dose (54 IU/day before and after) or BMI (26 kg/m2 before and after). In people with baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% (n=26 / 83), HbA1c decreased by 0.9%. The frequency of severe hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.22 to 0.05 events / year (p=0.045). In people with frequent non severe hypoglycaemia (n=8), events decreased from 4.5±2.0 to 2.8±0.9 / week (p=0.358). Systolic (−6.5 mmHg, p=0.035) and diastolic (−3.4 mmHg, p=0.003) blood pressure improved without change of number of antihypertensive medication (1.9±2.1 vs. 1.8±2.0, p=0.288). Conclusions In people with DM1, metabolic control improved after the inpatient intervention without increasing insulin dosage or BMI. The inpatient intervention remains effective to substantially improve metabolic control under the present circumstances of care.

No abstract