Several factors that influence the inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract (STT) cells produced by repetitive peripheral conditioning stimulation have been studied. Identified STT cells were recorded from the lumbosacral spinal cord in intact, anesthetized monkeys. In addition, presumed STT cells were recorded from unanesthetized, decerebrate or decerebrate, spinalized monkeys; these cells were identified by antidromic activation from the contralateral ventral lateral funiculus of the upper cervical spinal cord. Activity of the STT cells was evoked by electrically stimulating the sural nerve with pulses having an intensity strong enough to activate C fibers. The C fiber evoked STT cell activity was compared before, during and after repetitive conditioning stimuli applied to the tibial nerve for 5 min. By applying repetitive strengths of conditioning stimuli, it was found that the A delta fiber group is the most important for producing inhibition of STT cells, although significant additional effects were also produced by the A alpha beta and C fiber groups. Conditioning stimuli with fixed intensity at different frequencies showed that the higher the frequency the more powerful the inhibition within the range we tested (0.5-20 Hz). The inhibition produced by peripheral nerve stimulation was segmentally organized, so the most effective nerve in producing inhibition amongst those tested was the ipsilateral tibial nerve. The contralateral sciatic nerve, the ipsilateral median nerve and the contralateral median nerve were less effective in that order. The results of the present experiments suggest that the most effective way to produce analgesia by peripheral nerve stimulation would be by high frequency stimulation of a nerve innervating the area from which pain originates with an intensity at least strong enough to activate A delta fibers.
Data analyzed in this study were derived from the responses of 128 spinothalamic tract (STT) cells and 110 thalamic neurons recorded in 75 anesthetized monkeys. A k-means cluster analysis, a nonhierarchical clustering technique, was performed using the relative magnitudes of responses to a graded series of innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli applied to the receptive field. For comparison, a parallel analysis was performed based on definitions of low-threshold (LT), wide dynamic range (WDR), and high-threshold (HT) cells used by our laboratory. For 128 STT cells, a classification scheme with three clusters was found statistically to be the best. This yielded groups of 22, 57, and 49 cells in clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cluster 1 cells were activated best by low-intensity mechanical stimuli, whereas cluster 3 cells were activated primarily by nociceptive stimuli. Cluster 2 cells had intermediate characteristics. When the classification scheme based on the cluster analysis was compared with the classification of the same neurons as LT, WDR, and HT cells, cluster 1 cells were divided into LT and WDR cells, whereas cluster 2 and 3 cells included WDR and HT cells. For 110 thalamic neurons, a classification scheme with five clusters was found statistically to be the best. Clusters 1-5 contained 25, 34, 17, 10, and 24 cells, respectively. Response characteristics of cells in each group indicated a gradual change in sensitivity to higher intensities of peripheral input from cluster 1 to 5. When this classification scheme was compared with the classification scheme previously used by our laboratory, cluster 1 cells belonged to the LT group, clusters 2 and 3 split into LT and WDR cells, and clusters 4 and 5 included WDR and HT cells. It is concluded that a classification scheme based on a cluster analysis of the responses of neurons to standardized stimuli may provide an objective and functionally meaningful way to categorize somatosensory neurons.
Inhibition of spinothalamic tract (STT) cells was produced by repetitive peripheral nerve conditioning stimulation with high intensity and low frequency pulses. Identified STT cells were recorded from the lumbosacral spinal cord of intact, anesthetized monkeys. In addition, presumed STT cells were recorded from both unanesthetized, decerebrated and decerebrated, spinalized monkeys. These cells were identified by antidromically activating them from the contralateral ventral lateral funiculus of the cervical spinal cord. Both C fiber activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve and activity evoked by noxious heat were greatly inhibited by repetitive conditioning stimuli applied either to the common peroneal or tibial nerve with a strong enough intensity for activation of C fibers at 2 Hz for 15 min. The inhibition was maintained during the period of conditioning stimulation and often outlasted stimulation by 20-30 min. The inhibition of cells produced by peripheral nerve stimulation was observed in decerebrate and spinalized animals as well as in intact anesthetized monkeys, although the mean recovery time in the decerebrate group was faster. This indicates that anesthetics did not interfere with the inhibitory mechanism. Furthermore, the presence of inhibition in spinalized animals means the inhibition must depend in part on spinal cord neuronal circuitry. Intravenous injection of naloxone produced a significant but small reduction of the recovery phase of the inhibition. No pharmacological agent was found that substantially interfered with the powerful inhibition produced during peripheral conditioning stimuli. The experimental animal model used in these experiments seems appropriate for studying the mechanisms of analgesia produced by peripheral nerve stimulation.
The activity of 132 neurons in the caudal part of the ventral posterior lateral nucleus (VPLc) of the thalamus was recorded from 23 anesthetized monkeys. All single thalamic units that could be excited by electrical search stimuli applied to the contralateral sciatic nerve were investigated. Responses of these cells to mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimuli applied in the periphery indicated that at least half of the sampled cells were nociceptive. Based on responses to graded mechanical stimuli applied to the periphery, 110 of the sampled cells that received a predominant input from cutaneous receptive fields were classified. There were 56 low-threshold, 39 wide dynamic range, and 15 high-threshold cells. The same neurons were also classified into five mechanical types based on a cluster analysis: types 1-5 contained 25, 34, 17, 10, and 24 cells, respectively. The fact that about half the population of cells belonged to either the wide dynamic or the high threshold group (or mechanical types 3-5) suggested that a large population of VPLc neurons respond to mechanical nociceptive stimuli either exclusively or preferentially. Responses of 63 thalamic neurons were tested to noxious heat pulses applied to their cutaneous receptive fields with a contact thermostimulator. Of these, 47 cells were excited, whereas only 16 cells did not respond. The peripheral nerve that innervated the receptive field of each of 82 thalamic neurons was stimulated with graded strengths to activate A fibers only or both A and C fibers. All tested cells responded to peripheral A fiber volleys. In addition, 42 of these cells responded to peripheral C fiber volleys. The C fiber responses could be either short lasting (a few hundreds of milliseconds) or long lasting (up to several seconds). The recording sites of 80 cells were reconstructed. Of these, 78 were in the VPLc nucleus and the remaining two were in the reticular nucleus of the thalamus. No obvious relationship between the response characteristics and the locations of the cells within the VPLc nucleus was found. Sampled thalamic units had a variety of sources of input from the periphery, including both cutaneous and/or deep tissue receptive fields. The majority of the cells, however, had exclusively cutaneous receptive fields. The sizes of the cutaneous receptive fields were often very small, so that nearly half (41%) of the receptive fields of cells sampled occupied an area of skin smaller than half the foot.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.