Recent research on the process of biological phosphorus removal in lab-scale treatment systems has indicated that: (i) the development of an actively polyP-accumulating bacterial community after the introduction of an anaerobic period may take at least 4 months; (ii) up to 80% of all aerobic bacteria isolated from these communities are able to accumulate polyP; (iii) polyP synthesized by the bacterial communities of lab-scale treatment systems is probably mainly low polymeric, not exceeding 20 P-residues, and this polyP is rapidly degraded during the anaerobic period; (iv) the enzymatic hydrolysis of polyP under anaerobic conditions is accompanied by PHB formation from exogenous acetate, reducing equivalents are provided by the degradation of carbohydrates; and (v) nitric oxide inhibits the release of phosphate under anaerobic conditions in Renpho and F&D sludges. Bacteria belonging to the genus Acinetobacter occur in a wide variety of activated sludges in which enhanced biological phosphate removal is observed. A. johnsonii 210A was studied in detail with respect to the elemental composition of polyP granules, the enzymatic synthesis and degradation of polyP, the regulation of polyP metabolism, and the transport of phosphate. A. johnsonii 210A reflects activated sludge in a number of ways as far as polyP metabolism is concerned but its polyP is highly polymeric and the phosphate efflux rate under anaerobic conditions is relatively low and not increased by exogenous acetate. In addition to Acinetobacter, other polyP-accumulating microorganisms may be involved in biological phosphorus removal. The isolation of polyP-accumulating denitrifying bacteria may well have interesting implications for a new process design in wastewater treatment systems. Further studies on the enzymes involved in polyP biosynthesis and on the uptake and efflux systems of phosphate, potassium, magnesium and lower fatty acids in pure cultures will enlarge our insight in the energetics of the metabolism of polyP. In addition, the regulation of the metabolism of polyP-accumulating organisms needs to be studied in more detail.
Activated sludge not containing significant numbers of denitrifying, polyphosphate [poly(P)]-accumulating bacteria was grown in a fill-and-draw system and exposed to alternating anaerobic and aerobic periods. During the aerobic period, poly(P) accumulated up to 100 mg of P · g of (dry) weight. When portions of the sludge were incubated anaerobically in the presence of acetate, 80 to 90% of the intracellular poly(P) was degraded and released as orthophosphate. Degradation of poly(P) was mainly catalyzed by the concerted action of polyphosphate:AMP phosphotransferase and adenylate kinase, resulting in ATP formation. In the presence of 0.3 mM nitric oxide (NO) in the liquid-phase release of phosphate, uptake of acetate, formation of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate, utilization of glycogen, and formation of ATP were severely inhibited or completely abolished. In cell extracts of the sludge, adenylate kinase activity was completely inhibited by 0.15 mM NO. The nature of this inhibition was probably noncompetitive, similar to that with hog adenylate kinase. Activated sludge polyphosphate glucokinase was also completely inhibited by 0.15 mM NO. It is concluded that the inhibitory effect of NO on acetate-mediated phosphate release by the sludge used in this study is due to the inhibition of adenylate kinase in the phosphate-releasing organisms. The inhibitory effect of nitrate and nitrite on phosphate release is probably due to their conversion to NO. The lack of any inhibitory effect of NO on adenylate kinase of the poly(P)-accumulatingAcinetobacter johnsonii 210A suggests that this type of organism is not involved in the enhanced biological phosphate removal by the sludges used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.