More than 40 years have now passed since the development of the resistance of plant pathogens to fungicide treatments emerged as a major threat to crop protection. This opening chapter describes the appearance of resistant pathogen populations during this time, indicates their impact on crop disease management and reviews progress in detecting resistance and preventing or delaying its onset and spread. The evolution and management of resistance in different classes of fungicides (benzimidazoles, 2-aminopyrimidines, phenylamides, sterol demethylation inhibitors, dicarboximides and quinone outside inhibitors) are described.

No abstract

Although Darwin knew of plant diseases, he did not study them as part of his analysis of natural selection. Effective plant disease control has only been developed after his death. This article explores the relevance of Darwin's ideas to three problem areas with respect to diseases caused by fungi: emergence of new diseases, loss of disease resistance bred into plants and development of fungicide resistance. Darwin's concept of change through natural or artificial selection relied on selection of many small changes, but subsequent genetic research has shown that change can also occur through large steps. Appearance of new diseases can involve gene duplication, transfer or recombination, but all evidence points to both host plant resistance and fungicide susceptibility being overcome through point mutations. Because the population size of diseases such as rusts and powdery and downy mildews is so large, all possible point mutations are likely to occur daily, even during moderate epidemics. Overcoming control measures therefore reflects the overall fitness of these mutants, and much resource effort is being directed towards assessment of their fitness, both in the presence and in the absence of selection. While recent developments in comparative genomics have caused some revision of Darwin's ideas, experience in managing plant disease control measures clearly demonstrates the relevance of concepts he introduced 150 years ago. It also reveals the remarkable speed and the practical impact of adaptation in wild microorganism populations to changes in their environment, and the difficulty of stopping or delaying such adaptation.

In tunnel experiments, the efficacy of dicarboximide sprays in controlling grey mould of strawberries was greatly decreased by the presence of dicarboximideresistant forms of Botrytis cinerea. The use of dichlofluanid, as a tank-mix or in an alternating programme, with a dicarboximide fungicide, procymidone, helped to maintain the efficacy of disease control but failed to prevent an increase in the proportion of dicarboximide-resistant forms of the pathogen.Alternative 'partner' fungicides (thiram, chlorothalonil) delayed build-up of resistance to dicarboximides. Build-up of resistance was absent or relatively small in unsprayed plots. Application of dichlofluanid alone was always associated with a substantial increase in dicarboximide resistance, although less than in procymidone-treated plots. Monitoring dicarboximide resistance in the tunnels during the winter, when no further sprays were applied, revealed a gradual decline in the proportion of dicarboximide-resistant forms in all previously treated plots.In laboratory studies on inoculated leaf debris, dichlofluanid treatment induced the build-up of dicarboximide-resistant forms of B . cinerea. Leaf-disc tests revealed cross-resistance of dicarboximide-resistant isolates towards dichlofluanid but not towards thiram or chlorothalonil. Dichlofluanid is widely used for control of B . cinerea and the implications of these results for the practical management of dicarboximide resistance in this pathogen are discussed.