Side effects after the first administration of OKT3, a murine anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) of the IgG2a class, are largely attributed to the release of cytokines as a result ofT cell activation caused by interaction with Fc receptors (FcR) on human monocytes. As human monocytes possess FcR for murine IgG2a but not for IgA, it is expected that an anti-CD3 mAb of the IgA class causes less side-effects than an IgG2a anti-CD3 mAb of the same idiotype. To test this hypothesis we treated 20 renal transplant patients prophylactically with either IgG2a or IgA anti-CD3 mAb in a prospective randomized double-blind study. The patients received 0.5 mg anti-CD3 mAb, either IgA (T3.A) or IgG2a (T3.G2a), twice daily during 10 d. Rejection incidence after T3.A and T3.G2a was not significantly different. Side effects score after the first administration of mAb was significantly less after T3.A than after T3.G2a (0.7 vs 2.7, P = 0.002). IL-6 and gamma IFN levels increased significantly at 3 h after T3.G2a, but not after T3.A. The TNF peak level occurring at 1 h after T3.A was much lower than after T3.G2a. In plasma, complement and neutrophil activation products only increased after T3.G2a and not after T3.A. Both T3.A and T3.G2a resulted in a complete depletion of CD3+ cells, but after T3.A, CD3 depletion was of shorter duration than after IgG2a. Finally, in contrast to T3.G2a, T3.A did not affect coagulation and fibrinolysis. In conclusion, an anti-CD3 mAb of the IgA class causes hardly any cytokine release and less side-effects as compared with its IgG2a switch variant. Provided T3.A is sufficiently immunosuppressive, it is superior to OKT3. (J.

OKT3 is the first anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody available for treatment in humans. Over the last few years it has proven to be a very powerful immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation. Clinical studies have shown that OKT3 is superior to high-dose steroids as first-line treatment for acute renal allograft rejection. Furthermore, it is comparable to antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in treating steroid-resistant rejection and is also effective as rescue treatment in ATG- and antilymphocyte globulin-(ALG-) resistant rejection. Despite its excellent rejection-reversal rate, OKT3 treatment is followed by a substantial percentage of re-rejections, most of which respond well to steroids. In the early post-transplantation period, a prophylactic course of OKT3 is very effective in preventing acute rejections, and in this respect it is probably equivalent to ATG. Indirect evidence exists that a prophylactic course of OKT3 may be beneficial in immunologically high-risk patients and in patients with delayed graft function. However, more clinical studies are required to answer the question whether OKT3 should be given as induction treatment, as first-line treatment, or as rescue treatment. To answer this question, the side effects of OKT3 should also be taken into account. First-dose-related side effects, although frequent and disturbing, are usually transient and seldom life-threatening, provided overhydration has been corrected and steroids have been given before the first administration. These side effects are attributed to the release of cytokines as a result of T-cell activation or lysis. After exposure of patients to OKT3 an increased incidence of infections and malignancies has been reported. However, it is not yet clear whether this is due to OKT3 as such, or whether it merely reflects the total burden of immunosuppression. Xeno-sensitization represents an important limitation to OKT3 treatment, although a second or third course can still be effective in patients with low antibody titers. The precise immunosuppressive mechanism of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies is yet unknown. Monitoring of patients treated with OKT3 revealed CD3 and/or T-cell antigen receptor depletion and immunological incompetence of remaining T cells. More clinical data are required to establish the correct dose and duration of OKT3 treatment. In conclusion, OKT3 is a powerful immunosuppressive agent but its real value in renal transplantation remains to be determined. A practical approach may be to reserve it for the treatment of steroid-resistant rejections.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract