Increased calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in external jugular venous blood during migraine attack is one of the most cited findings in the headache literature. The finding has not been convincingly reproduced and is based on comparison with historic control subjects. The validity of this finding is important for the understanding of migraine. We therefore investigated the issue using an intrapatient comparison design and two different CGRP assays. We sampled blood from the external jugular and cubital vein during, as well as outside of, an attack of migraine without aura. We succeeded in 17 patients, whereas only cubital fossa blood could be sampled in an additional 4 patients. CGRP was measured with the same assay as most previous studies (assay I) and furthermore with a more sensitive and validated assay (assay II). For assay I, mean CGRP concentration in external jugular venous blood during attack was 17.18 pmol/L compared with 15.88 pmol/L outside of attack. Mean difference was 1.81 pmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.88, 6.41; p = 0.44). In peripheral blood during attack, CGRP was 16.86 pmol/L compared with 17.57 pmol/L outside of attack. Mean difference was -0.79 pmol/L (95% CI: -4.64, 3.06; p = 0.69). For assay II, external jugular venous blood concentration of CGRP during attack was 32.59 pmol/L compared with 30.59 pmol/L outside of attack; mean difference was 2.00 pmol/L (standard error, 2.39; 95% CI: -3.07, 7.07; p = 0.416). In peripheral blood during attack, CGRP was 33.37 pmol/L compared with 31.84 pmol/L outside of attack; mean difference was 1.53 pmol/L (standard error, 1.90; 95% CI: -2.46, 5.51; p = 0.431). Thus, no difference between CGRP level in external jugular or cubital fossa blood during and outside of attack was found. No difference was found between external jugular and peripheral venous blood. Thus, previous findings of increased CGRP level in external jugular or cubital fossa venous blood could not be confirmed. Our finding strongly suggests that CGRP is not increased in jugular venous blood during migraine without aura. CGRP cannot be used as a biomarker to validate human or animal models of migraine.
Lactic acidosis is a common cause of metabolic acidosis and is usually connected with high mortality. However, changes in the level of lactate and pH can also be seen after generalized epileptic attacks, due to local muscle hypoxia during the seizures. Although these changes can be quite marked, the condition is self-limiting and usually does not call for any specific treatment. We report five cases of lactic acidosis following convulsions from our centre.
To test the hypothesis that permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is altered during migraine attack due to enhanced activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), we investigated MMP-3, MMP-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMP)-1 in the external jugular vein during and outside of migraine attacks in 21 patients with migraine without aura. In addition, we measured plasma levels of several other proteins including MMP-7, -8, -10 and TIMP-2. We used Rules-Based Medicine multi-analyte profiling and protein array technologies to study plasma concentration of MMPs. There was no difference in MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels between ictal and interictal periods. We found significantly decreased plasma levels of MMP-3 in the external jugular (P = 0.002) and cubital (P = 0.008) vein during attacks compared with outside of attacks. We found no correlation of ictal or interictal MMP-3, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 to migraine duration and frequency analysed in 21 patients (P > 0.05). There was no difference between ictal and interictal plasma levels of MMP-7, -8, -10 and TIMP-2 (P > 0.05). Our data suggest that plasma MMP-9 cannot be used as a biomarker of BBB disruption in migraine without aura. Decreased MMP-3 levels are an interesting and unexpected finding warranting further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.