Aluminium (Al) toxicity is a very important factor limiting the growth of plants on acidic soils. Recently, a number of workers have shown that, under certain conditions, silicon (Si) can ameliorate the toxic effects of A1 in hydroponic culture. The mechanism of the amelioration is unclear, but three suggestions have been put forward: Si‐induced increase in solution pH during the preparation of hydroponic solutions; reduced availability of Al due to the formation of hydroxyaluminosilicate (HAS) species in those solutions during plant growth; or in planta detoxification. It is now known that it is possible to make up Al and Si solutions in an order in which pH is lowered prior to Al addition; in these cases amelioration has still been observed. Amelioration has also been noted in experiments where HAS formation is minimal. These observations would suggest that, at least under some circumstances, there is an in planta component to the amelioration phenomenon. Several microanalytical investigations have noted codeposition of Al and Si in root cell walls. We propose a model in which root cell walls are the main internal sites of aluminosilicate (AS) and/or HAS formation and of Al detoxification. Factors promoting AS/HAS formation in this compartment include: high apoplastic pH; the presence of organic substances (e.g. malate); and the presence of suitable local concentrations of reactive forms of Al and Si, on or within the surfaces of the wall matrix. All these are likely to be important in the amelioration of Al toxicity.

No abstract

Two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, one aluminium tolerant (Atlas 66) and one sensitive (Scout 66), were grown in a continuous-¯ow culture system (£pH 5.0) containing aluminium (0±100 lM) and silicon (0±2000 lM) in factorial combination. Treatment with silicon resulted in a highly signi®cant amelioration of aluminium toxicity as assessed by root growth in both cultivars. Amelioration was in¯uenced by wheat cultivar and silicon concentration, as 2000 lM silicon signi®-cantly ameliorated the toxic eects of 100 lM aluminium in Atlas 66, and only 5 lM silicon alleviated the eect of 1.5 lM aluminium on Scout 66. Nutrient medium pH was critical, as an amelioration by silicon was apparent only at pH > 4.2 for Atlas 66, and at pH > 4.6 for Scout 66. Silicon neither reduced levels of toxic aluminium species in the growth solutions, nor the amount of aluminium taken up by roots. In experiments to assess exudation of malate by Atlas 66 roots treated with 100 lM aluminium, the presence of 2000 lM silicon (pH 4.6) was found to have a negligible eect on exudation. In contrast, citrate, a known aluminium chelator, reduced aluminium-induced exudation of malate at 5±40 lM and completely inhibited it at 100 lM citrate. The results indicate that silicon does not reduce aluminium phytotoxicity as a result of aluminium/silicon interactions in the external media, and that the mechanism of amelioration has an in planta component.

Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP), cyclohexanedione (CHD) and phenylurea herbicides was determined in UK populations of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. Two populations (Oxford AA1, Notts. A1) were highly resistant (Resistance indices 13-->1000) to the AOPP and CHD herbicides fenoxaprop, diclofop, fluazifop-P and sethoxydim, but only marginally resistant to the phenylurea, chlorotoluron. Analyses of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) activity showed that an insensitive ACCase conferred resistance to all the AOPP/CHD herbicides investigated. Another population, Oxford S1, showed no resistance to sethoxydim at the population level, but contained a small proportion of plants (<10%) with an insensitive ACCase. Genetic studies on the Notts A1 and Oxford S1 populations demonstrated that target site resistance conferred by an insensitive ACCase is monogenic, nuclearly inherited with the resistant allele showing complete dominance. Investigations of the molecular basis of resistance in the Notts A1 population showed that sethoxydim resistance in A myosuroides was associated with the substitution of an isoleucine in susceptible with a leucine in resistant plants, which has also been found in three other resistant grass-weed species (Setaria viridis (L) Beauv, Avena fatua L, Lolium rigidum Gaud).

No abstract