Rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a costly, cumbersome, and often painful process. Physical therapy contributes to the successful outcome of TKA but can be expensive. Alternative methods of obtaining good functional results that help minimize costs are desirable. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a potential option. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has been shown to increase quadriceps muscle strength and activation following TKA. Functional scores also improve following TKA when NMES is added to conventional therapy protocols vs therapy alone. The authors hypothesized that rehabilitation managed by a physical therapist would not result in a functional advantage for patients undergoing TKA when compared with NMES and an unsupervised at-home range of motion exercise program and that patient satisfaction would not differ between the 2 groups. Seventy patients were randomized into a postoperative protocol of conventional physical therapy with a licensed therapist, including range of motion exercises and strengthening exercises, or into a program of NMES and range of motion exercises performed at home without therapist supervision. Noninferiority of the NMES program was obtained 6 weeks postoperatively (Knee Society pain/function scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, flexion). Noninferiority was shown 6 months postoperatively for all parameters. The results suggest that rehabilitation managed by a physical therapist results in no functional advantage or difference in patient satisfaction when compared with NMES and an unsupervised at-home range of motion program. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and unsupervised at-home range of motion exercises may provide an option for reducing the cost of the postoperative TKA recovery process without compromising quadriceps strength or patient satisfaction.
This abstract was awarded the student prize for best oral original communication.The age-related loss of muscle mass and strength is associated with frailty and loss of independence (1) . The prevalence and determinants of loss of muscle mass and muscle strength have yet to be fully characterised in the context of an Irish population. Previous studies have implicated total energy, protein, vitamin D and omega 3 fatty acid intakes in the attenuation of these losses (2) . The objectives of this study were to examine the determinants of handgrip strength and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in a cohort of community-dwelling older adults living in Ireland.In a cross-sectional analysis, muscle mass, strength and dietary intake was assessed 280 free-living adults aged 65 years and over (76±8y). Muscle mass was measured using bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) and muscle strength using a handgrip dynamometer. Dietary intake was assessed by 24-h recall. The prevalence of low muscle mass and low muscle strength was determined according to the EWGSOP criteria (1). Multiple linear regression was conducted to examine predictors of handgrip strength (kg) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI; kg/m 2 ). The prevalence of low muscle strength was 16 % in men and 32 % in women. The prevalence of low muscle mass was 23 % in men and 21 % in women. Multiple regression models demonstrated that age, height, SMI, vitamin D intake and gender were significant predictors of handgrip strength. The model explained 57 % of the variance in handgrip from the predictors (p < 0·01; R 2 = 0·57). Body mass, age, gender and average energy intake were predictors of SMI (p < 0·01; R 2 = 0 .53). Our data support previous work demonstrating that age and gender are important predictors of muscle mass and strength in older adults. Further work is required to elucidate the role of nutrient intakes in the development and progression of age-related muscle mass and strength loss.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.