Several mobility models [2] [6] [8] have been proposed and the survey [1] on the mobility models for mobile ad-hoc A mobile ad-hoc network is formed by a group of mobile networks illustrates the different models and their weaknesses hosts, each installed with a wireless network interface, in resembling the realistic scenario. All the well-known without the aid of infrastructure. The performance evaluation mobility models such as Random WayPoint Mobility Model, ofseveralprotocols in ad-hoc networks is carried out under a Random Walk Model, Random Direction Model and the simulation environment. The simulation shouldprovide us the recent models like Obstacle Mobility Model [2] vary widely ideal environment under which the behavior ofnodes and the in their movement characteristics. Though the [2] model protocols can be tested. The mobility models therefore play a considers the placement of obstacles, all these models choose vital role in describing the topology and the movement of the the destination, next point to move in the network area, of a nodes. Recent survey on the mobility models for the ad-hoc node in a random fashion. None of them uses the factors like networks illustrates the different models and their weaknesses time and attraction weight, which decides the destination of in resembling the realistic scenario. Though the recent each mobile node in the real world. models consider the placement of obstacles, still there are This paper, VEridical MObility Model, will be introducing some weaknesses. This paper provides a realistic mobility the time factor and the attraction points for deciding the model, called VeMo, by dividing the network area into destination. The simulation area was divided into several different types ofzones. The movement of the node considers zones depending upon the environment. Then the obstacles of the time factor and the attraction weight. The results shows varying sizes, replicating the buildings, were placed in all the that the performance of the standard routing protocol like zones. The traveling path for each node from one point to the DSR degrades while it is being used with this mobility model. other was constructed using the Voronoi diagram. The destination of each node is selected by considering the

No abstract