Aluminium matrix composites are mostly used in aerospace and automobile industries due to their improved properties such as hardness, strength, wear resistance combined with considerable weight savings over unreinforced alloys. This paper reports the lubricated wear behavior of Al6061composites reinforced with titanium carbide particles fabricated by stir casting route. The experiments were conducted using central composite rotatable design method. The wear test was performed on the pin on disc machine where aluminium composite pins were rubbed against EN31 steel discs in the presence lubricant. A mathematical model has been developed by response surface methodology. The validity of the developed model was checked by Analysis of variance method. The experimental results revealed that the addition of lubricant at the contact surface reduced wear rate of the composite.
The Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) is a simplified and robust flaw assessment methodology which simultaneously connects two dominant failure criteria: Linear Elastic Fracture mechanics (LEFM) on one end and Plastic collapse on other end. This interaction is the realm of Elastic Plastic Fracture Mechanics (EPFM.) It is popularly known as the R6 approach which graphically characterizes the impact of plasticity on crack driving force. In the recent years, there has been continuous interest in using Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) to assess the failure of cracked structures subjected to biaxial loadings. Biaxiality is defined as the ratio of stress applied parallel and normal to the crack. Some aircraft components operate under negative biaxial ratios up to −0.5. In this paper, a detailed study on FAD was conducted using FEA computed J-integral methods to investigate the effect of biaxial loading using different FAD approaches for geometries with notches. Geometries with a crack that emanates at a fillet region were simulated with various biaxial loading ratios from −0.5 to +0.5 using 2014-T6 material. FAD curves were numerically generated for cracks at notched regions subjected to various biaxial loadings using J-integral values from finite element analyses and validated its practical application. Comparison studies were made between uniaxial and biaxial loading cases with FAD curves created using standard approaches for four different crack sizes. Under small scale yielding, this study clearly shows that FAD curves are not influenced by negative biaxial loading at low load (up to 40% of yield strength). It was clearly confirmed that the majority of previously developed analytical FAD curves do not effectively account for notch and plasticity effects due to negative biaxilaity. Based on this study, tension normal to the crack and compression parallel to the crack is the worst combination and it has a very pronounced effect on FAD curve shapes. The standard analytical FAD curves are non-conservative compared to the approach recommended here, particularly under the worst case condition. The proposed method is expected to predict lower failure loads relative to currently accepted analytical methods.
The failure assessment diagram (FAD) is a simplified and robust flaw assessment methodology, which simultaneously connects two dominant failure criteria: linear elastic fracture mechanics on one end and plastic collapse on the other end. This interaction is in the realm of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. It is popularly known as the R6 approach, which graphically characterizes the impact of plasticity on crack driving force. In recent years, there has been continuous interest in using FADs to assess the failure of cracked structures subjected to biaxial loadings. Biaxiality is defined as the ratio of stress applied parallel and normal to the crack. Some pressure loaded aircraft components operate under negative biaxial ratios up to −0.5. In this paper, a detailed study on FAD was conducted using finite element analysis computed J-integral methods to investigate the effect of biaxial loading using different FAD approaches for geometries with notches. Geometries with a crack that emanates at a fillet region were simulated with various biaxial loading ratios from −0.5 to +0.5 using 2014-T6 material. FAD curves were numerically generated for cracks at notched regions subjected to various biaxial loadings using J-integral values from finite element analyses. These results were compared with standard FAD approaches. All comparison studies were made between uniaxial and biaxial loading cases with FAD curves created using four different crack sizes. Under small scale yielding, this study clearly shows that FAD curves are not influenced by negative biaxial loading at low load (up to 40% of yield strength). It was clearly confirmed that the majority of previously developed analytical FAD curves do not effectively account for notch and plasticity effects due to negative biaxiality. Based on this study, tension normal to the crack and compression parallel to the crack is the worst combination, and it has a very pronounced effect on FAD curve shapes. The standard analytical FAD curves are nonconservative compared with the approach recommended here, particularly under the worst case condition. FAD curves developed are shown to predict lower failure loads as compared with the currently accepted analytical FAD approaches defined in existing standards, e.g., R6 and API 579. The impact of negative biaxial loading can be investigated directly using a J-integral FAD approach but can be compared with ease by plotting both approaches in a FAD format.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.