Those who had bilateral implantation of the Array multifocal IOL obtained better uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuities and reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, and less spectacle dependency than patients with bilateral monofocal IOLs.

A prospective, randomized study compared the surgically induced astigmatism after 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm, and 5.0 mm temporal corneal tunnel incisions over six months. We studied 60 eyes of 60 patients who had phacoemulsification through a two-step clear corneal tunnel incision and implantation of one of three posterior chamber intraocular lenses (IOLs). Patients were divided into three groups of 20 each: Group A, cartridge injection of a foldable plate-haptic silicone IOL through a 3.5 mm self-sealing incision; Group B, cartridge injection of a disc silicone IOL through a 4.0 mm self-sealing incision; Group C, 5.0 mm optic poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL through a 5.0 mm incision with one radial suture. Corneal topography data were obtained using a computerized videokeratographic analysis system preoperatively and one week and six months postoperatively. Vector analysis was performed to calculate the surgically induced astigmatism. After the first postoperative week, mean induced astigmatism was 0.63 diopters (D) (+/- 0.41) in Group A, 0.64 D (+/- 0.35) in Group B, and 0.91 D (+/- 0.77) in Group C. After six months, it was 0.37 D (+/- 0.14) in Group A, 0.56 D (+/- 0.34) in Group B, and 0.70 D (+/- 0.50) in Group C. Surgically induced astigmatism was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (P < .05) and Group C (P < .005) after six months. Vector analysis demonstrated that temporal corneal tunnel incisions induced clinically minimal astigmatism over six months postoperatively depending on incision size.

No abstract

Compared with 2 separate operations in patients with significant lens opacities and vitreoretinal pathology, combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery provided more rapid visual rehabilitation. The visual outcome and complications depended primarily on underlying posterior segment pathology and were not related to the combined procedure technique.

To evaluate visual results after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with asymmetrical light distribution for the far and near focus. Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent bilateral implantation of silicone-optic, foldable, diffractive IOLs in a prospective, 2-center, noncontrolled interventional study. Each patient had a distant-dominant multifocal IOL implanted in 1 eye and a near-dominant multifocal IOL implanted in the fellow eye. Refractive and visual results, including contrast acuity and binocular visual function, were determined. Patients were questioned for postoperative spectacle usage. Results: Visual and contrast acuity in the dominant focus of either lens was superior to that in the nondomi-nant focus at 3.5 to 12 months postoperatively, ie, performance was best at distance for the distant-dominant and at near for the near-dominant lens. In binocular viewing, the monocular maximal results added up to an improved binocular visual performance. Binocular visual function was within normal limits. Eighty percent of patients reported no use of spectacles at any time postoperatively. Conclusions: Bilateral implantation of asymmetrical diffractive IOLs is an effective alternative for restoring simultaneous distance and near vision with a potential for improved contrast sensitivity compared with conventional multifocal IOLs.