The advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) over the last decade have led to a transplant-related mortality below 15%. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a life-threatening complication of HCT that belongs to a group of diseases increasingly identified as transplant-related, systemic endothelial diseases. In most cases, SOS/VOD resolves within weeks; however, severe SOS/VOD results in multi-organ dysfunction/failure with a mortality rate >80%. A timely diagnosis of SOS/VOD is of critical importance, given the availability of therapeutic options with favorable tolerability. Current diagnostic criteria are used for adults and children. However, over the last decade it has become clear that SOS/VOD is significantly different between the age groups in terms of incidence, genetic predisposition, clinical presentation, prevention, treatment and outcome. Improved understanding of SOS/VOD and the availability of effective treatment questions the use of the Baltimore and Seattle criteria for diagnosing SOS/VOD in children. The aim of this position paper is to propose new diagnostic and severity criteria for SOS/VOD in children on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Summary:Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver is a complication observed particularly in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Defibrotide (DF) is a polydeoxyribonucleotide with aptameric activity on endothelium. We evaluated in a retrospective analysis the efficacy of DF in pediatric patients developing hepatic VOD after HSCT. A total of 45 patients between 0.2 and 20 years (median age: 8.2 years) with hepatic VOD were treated with DF: 22 patients (49%) met risk criteria for severe or progressive disease and 23 (51%) for moderately severe and mild disease. The median duration of DF treatment was 17 days. In all, 34 patients (76%) achieved complete response (CR) with a survival rate of 64% at day 100. CR rate in patients with severe disease was 50% with longterm survival of 36%. The average DF dose in the CR group was 45 mg/kg/day and in the no responder (NR) group 27 mg/kg/day. The use of additional drugs besides DF to treat VOD made no difference in the outcome compared to DF alone. The average interval from diagnosis to start of DF was 1 day in the CR and 5.5 days in NR group. In multivariate analysis, early intervention remained the only significant factor for a CR.

This retrospective analysis evaluated 51 children (0.7-17 years; median eight) with high-risk or advanced hematological malignancies, including 18 (35%) patients undergoing second/third hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT), not eligible for standard myeloablative regimens and transplanted from matched sibling (MSD) (n ¼ 24) or matched unrelated (MUD) (n ¼ 27) donors. Preparative regimens were based on treosulfan (TREO) i.v., a structural analog of BU, given at total dose of 30 g/m 2 (n ¼ 21) or 36-42 g/ m 2 (n ¼ 30) in combination with, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan and/or VP-16 according to diagnosis, and risk factors. Deaths due to early regimenrelated toxicity (RRT) did not occur. Nonrelapse mortality was 8% at 1 year and 16% after 4 years. Myeloid engraftment was achieved in 94%, complete donor chimerism in 90% of patients. A 4-year incidence of relapse was 24%, and was significantly lower after MUD-HSCT (8%) than after MSD-HSCT (39%), but similar in children undergoing first (28%) or second/third HSCT (17%). A 4-year disease-free survival was 61%, but it was significantly better in myeloid (73%), than in lymphoid malignancies (41%). Thus, children with high-risk and advanced hematological malignancies and high-risk of life-threatening RRT can be transplanted effectively and safely using TREO-based regimens. Particularly favorable results were achieved in myeloid malignancies and in children undergoing second HSCT.

Prothrombotic risk factors should be included in a screening program in ALL children treated according to the BFM study protocols. Further prospective studies are recommended to establish adequate prophylactic anticoagulant treatment during ALL (BFM) polychemotherapy.