Increasing demand for surgery and anaesthesia has created an imperative to manage anaesthetic workforce and caseload. This may include changes to distribution of cases amongst anaesthetists of different grades, including non-physician anaesthetists. To achieve this safely, an assessment of case complexity is essential. We present a novel system for scoring complexity of cases in anaesthesia, the Oxford Anaesthetic Complexity score. This integrates patient, anaesthetic, surgical and systems factors, and is different from assessments of risk. We adopted an end-user development approach to the design of the score, and validated it using a dataset of anaesthetic cases. Across 688 cases, the median (IQR [range]) complexity score was 19 (17-22 [15-33]). Cases requiring a consultant anaesthetist had a significantly higher median (IQR [range]) score than those requiring a senior trainee at 22 (20-25 [15-33]) vs. 19 (17-21 [15-28]), p < 0.001. Cases undertaken in a tertiary acute hospital had a significantly higher score than those in a district general hospital, the median (IQR [range]) scores being 20 (17-22 [15-33]) vs. 17 (16-19 [17-28]), p < 0.001. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed good prediction of complexity sufficient to require a consultant anaesthetist, with area under the curve of 0.84. Any rise in complexity above baseline (score > 15) was strongly predictive of a case too complex for a junior trainee (positive predictive value 0.93). The Oxford Anaesthetic Complexity score can be used to match cases to different grades of anaesthetist, and can help in defining cases appropriate for the expanding nonphysician anaesthetist workforce.

Background: Orthoplastic operations for lower limb osteomyelitis (LLOM) involving microvascular free tissue reconstructions ("free-flaps") are usually performed under general anaesthesia (GA), with or without epidural anaesthesia (EA) due to concerns about the discomfort associated with prolonged surgery. However, our clinical experience supports "awake" epidural anaesthesia with sedation (EA þ Sed) rather than EA þ GA as a technique of choice for this type of surgery.Methods: We used a standardised postoperative questionnaire to formally assess the experiences and outcomes for 50 patients who underwent free-flaps for LLOM under EA þ Sed. Findings:The mean duration of surgery was 522 min (8.7 h), range 240e875 min. There were no ITU admissions or flap failures. Postoperatively, fifty patients completed a standardised questionnaire about their experiences before the operation, in the anaesthetic room and theatre. 80% were aware of the procedure at least "some of the time". 72.5% patients and 75% respectively, did not have any concerns in the anaesthetic room and theatre. Concerns expressed by the remaining patients were manageable. 97.5% of those patients who recalled their operation reported their overall experience as "comfortable" or "very comfortable". 92% of respondents had undergone previous lower limb surgery under GA ± EA. In this subgroup, 91.3% reported the recovery after EA þ Sed as "quicker" than GA, and 89.4% reported their experience with EA þ Sed as "better". All fifty patients (100%) were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their experience and all but one (98%) would recommend this technique to others.Conclusions: Our study showed that despite prolonged duration, the patients' reported experiences and outcomes were excellent when EA þ Sed was used for orthoplastic operations involving free-flaps for LLOM. We recommend EA þ Sed as the anaesthetic technique of choice for such patients.

Introduction Lower limb arthroplasty is performed under general anaesthesia (GA) or regional anaesthesia (RA). There is increasing evidence of the surgical and anaesthetic benefits of RA. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines advise using either but highlight a lack of data comparing outcomes of RA and GA for these procedures. We conducted a service evaluation, prospectively analysing elective orthopaedic cases performed at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK from 19/11/2018 to 03/04/2019. We aimed to compare data on anaesthetic assessment, intra-operative parameters and patient satisfaction for RA and GA cases. Methods We selected elective patients, aged above 18, undergoing total hip, total knee or unilateral knee arthroplasties. Prospective quantitative and qualitative data were collected using two forms. Firstly, anaesthetists completed a case report recording demographic data, intra-operative details and reason for anaesthetic choice. Secondly a questionnaire gathered patient satisfaction data. This was analysed using descriptive statistics and presented in tables. Results Data for 132 patients were collected over the service evaluation period. After exclusion, 99 patients were included for final analysis; 59 underwent GA and 40 had RA. GA was used predominantly due to patient preference (74.6%). RA was used primarily due to anaesthetic preference (75%); most commonly due to speed of list and duration of operation. Overall patients had low pain scores (0.3/10) and high pre-operative anxiety levels (4.6/10) regardless of anaesthetic. Conclusion Our results show high patient satisfaction with GA and RA for lower limb arthroplasty; however, pre-operative anxiety was common for both. Patient preference and comfort influenced choice of anaesthesia, highlighting the importance of pre-operative counselling and education to facilitate shared decision making, leading to favourable post-operative outcomes.

No abstract