Purpose Similar to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the diffusing capacity of the lung (D LCO ) might be decreased and associated with poor prognosis in preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), a clinical entity as a prodromal phase of COPD. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the distributions of D LCO and to assess the association between D LCO and mortality among subjects with PRISm. Patients and Methods We conducted an observational cohort study at the National Hospital Organization Fukuoka National Hospital. We classified the 899 patients ≥ 40 years of age with an assessment of D LCO into five groups based on spirometry: preserved spirometry, PRISm, mild COPD, moderate COPD, and severe/very severe COPD. The prevalence of low D LCO (< 80% per predicted) was compared among the five groups. Using PRISm patients with follow-up data, we further investigated the association of low D LCO with all-cause mortality. Results The prevalence of low D LCO in the PRISm group (58.8%) was significantly higher than that in the preserved-spirometry group (21.8%), the mild-COPD group (23.5%), and the moderate-COPD group (36.0%) (all P < 0.01), and it was comparable to that in the severe/very severe-COPD group (63.2%). The results remained unchanged after adjusting for potential confounders. Among the PRISm subjects, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in the low-D LCO group than in the preserved-D LCO group ( P < 0.01). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the low-D LCO group than in the preserved-D LCO group (HR = 10.10 (95% confidence interval 2.33–43.89)). Conclusion Diffusing capacity was more impaired in PRISm subjects than in those with preserved spirometry or mild to moderate COPD. Regarding PRISm, low D LCO was a significant risk factor for all-cause mortality. Clinicians should assess D LCO in the management of PRISm to predict the future risk of overall death.
We report a case of a 68-year-old woman who was being treated for bronchial asthma and developed allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) that was unresponsive to benralizumab therapy but went into remission with dupilumab therapy. The patient presented with an exacerbation of dry cough and was diagnosed with ABPA based on new diagnostic criteria. Despite the attempted therapeutic intervention, the patient declined to use systemic corticosteroids due to concerns about potential side effects. Subsequently, itraconazole and benralizumab were administered, with temporary relief before relapse. Given the patient's refusal to continue itraconazole and benralizumab, dupilumab was administered as an alternative therapy, which resulted in significant improvement of both symptoms and imaging. Although the use of biological agents for ABPA lacks clear evidence, our results suggest that dupilumab may provide an effective therapeutic strategy.
An 82‐year‐old man had been diagnosed with asthma. He experienced repeated exacerbations requiring treatment with a systemic corticosteroid despite being treated with medications including high‐dose fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol, montelukast sodium, and theophylline; treatment with mepolizumab was then initiated. The patient had been free from exacerbations for 15 months; however, he suffered from post‐obstructive pneumonia and atelectasis secondary to mucoid impaction in the right middle lobe of the lung, accompanied by a productive cough, wheezing, dyspnea, and right chest pain. In addition to the development of mucus plugs, the levels of serum IgE specific to Aspergillus spp. became positive; a definite diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) was established. The patient underwent treatment with tezepelumab. Over 3 months, the mucus plugs and pulmonary opacities diminished gradually in parallel with the improvement in the control of asthmatic symptoms. Tezepelumab might provide a novel steroid‐sparing strategy for the management of ABPA, although further studies are required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.