Most women who are treated for advanced-stage HL experience amenorrhea after therapy. Amenorrhea is significantly more frequent in women with advanced-stage HL receiving eight cycles of dose-escalated BEACOPP and in women older than 30 years at first treatment. Furthermore, the data show a statistical association between the use of oral contraceptives and return of menstrual cycle, which is subject to further investigation.
Patients with HD have an increased risk for inadequate semen quality even prior to treatment. Infertility is more frequent in patients with elevated ESR and advanced stage of disease. This association demonstrates the predominant influence of the disease on fertility. Assuming HD is the major initial cause for infertility efforts should be made to identify new non-gonadal toxic chemotherapies to be able to regain fertility after effective therapy. Further investigations have to be performed to clarify mechanisms inducing fertility defects in patients with HD.
In the GHSG, the incidence of secondary NHL with 0.9% is relatively low compared with previously reported series. The prognosis of secondary NHL seems dismal and is significantly influenced by time of occurrence and the age-adjusted IPFI. In a subset of patients with secondary NHL, long-term disease-free survival could be achieved.
A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral monotherapy with 500 mg levofloxacin in comparison with 4.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam 3 times a day in patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Low risk was defined by oral temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C on one occasion or > or = 38.0 degrees C twice within 24 hours and granulocytopenia < or = 500/microL for less than 10 days. The primary end point was defined as defervescence after 72 hours followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary end points were overall response, time to defervescence, survival on day 30, and toxicity. Thirty-four episodes were included. Fever of unknown origin accounted for 26 (76.5%) of the episodes, microbiologically defined infection for 5 (14.7%) of the episodes, and clinically defined infection for 3 (8.8%) of the episodes. On an intent-to-treat basis, all episodes were evaluable for the primary end point. Levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam were successful after 72 hours of treatment in 76.5% and 88.3% of the episodes. Overall response was achieved in 94.1% and 100% of the episodes, respectively. One inpatient in the oral treatment group died of septic shock without identification of a causative pathogen. A larger phase III trial is warranted to further evaluate the lack of inferiority of the oral monotherapy regimen versus standard intravenous therapy.
In general, it was agreed that high rates of toxicities during treatment occur in the elderly and that there is a frequent occurrence of early relapse. It is clear that different combinations of effective therapies with lower toxicity are required. It was felt, however, that certainly in the 60-70 year age group, approaches should be vigorous to and the same diagnostic and staging procedures as in younger individuals, but with much closer monitoring of toxicity and response to treatment. It was felt that as part of the approach, liberal support with haemopoeitic growth factors (G-CSF) was necessary to reduce prolonged neutropenia. It is important to understand that age in general is not a contrary indication for aggressive treatment and that biologically younger patients under the age of 65 years, in good physical and mental condition, often should be given with stage-adapted treatment, analogous to conventional treatment protocols for the <60 years age group. It was also considered that, in patients who clearly could not accept conventional treatment, study groups could begin to define the best palliative care for patients with pre-existing organ impairment, and that in all situations of assessment, whether in trial or not, there should be a detailed prospective assessment of quality of life parameters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.