The aim of this study was to assess if the entire mediastinum (M), the bilateral supraclavicular area (S), and the left gastric area (L) should be all included in the irradiation volume. The clinical data of 204 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone prophylactic postoperative radiotherapy after radical surgery were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into four groups: group A, 26 patients with irradiated M alone; group B, 139 patients with irradiated M + S; group C, 10 patients with irradiated M + L; and group D, 29 patients with irradiated M + S + L. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 36% in group A, 31% in group B, 40% in group C and 44% in group D (chi2=3.05, P =0.39), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the irradiated extent was not a significant influential factor (hazard ratio=0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.03, P =0.10). None of 43 patients without the L irradiated and with disease in the upper and middle upper thirds (defined in middle third but with upper third invaded), and one of 83 patients without the L irradiated and with disease in the middle third only thoracic esophagus were shown to have abdominal lymph node metastasis. Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in patients in the lower and middle lower thirds (defined in middle third but with lower third invaded) were, respectively, 1/43 and 1/18 whether the S was irradiated or not. It seems unnecessary that the L be irradiated when the primary site is in the upper, middle, and middle upper thirds of the thoracic esophagus after radical surgery. Similarly, S may be unnecessarily irradiated in the lower and middle lower thirds.

Highlights A novel grey Richards model GERM(1,1, ) is proposed. The optimal nonlinear terms and background value of the novel model are determined by Genetic algorithm. The comparative study shows that the new model is superior to the other seven benchmark models. The predict the daily number of new confirmed cases of COVID-19 of four regions are projected.

Advanced or metastatic cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and the 5-year overall survival is <5% with conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), achieved initial success in advanced solid tumors, while their efficacy and safety in advanced or metastatic cervical cancer remains to be explored. Previous studies found high-risk HPV infection and elevated PD-L1 expression in cervical precancerous lesions and squamous cell carcinoma. Meanwhile, elevated PD-L1 expression, high cytotoxic T lymphocyte infiltration, and abnormal cytotoxic T lymphocyte function might benefit inflammation infiltration for ICIs in the tumor microenvironment. Patients with HPV infection, squamous cell carcinoma, advanced stage, large tumor size, poor differentiation, metastatic disease, history of multiple childbirth and abortion, or a previous history of receiving chemotherapy might be associated with positive PD-L1 expression. Although there is no correlation between PD-L1 expression and prognosis using conventional radiotherapy, patients with high PD-L1 expression have a poorer prognosis. Several clinical studies demonstrate preliminary safety and efficacy for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and the exploration of combination strategies such as immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy, or dual ICIs is ongoing. This paper systematically reviews PD-L1 expression patterns and their relationship with prognosis, along with reported and ongoing clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cervical cancer to clarify the prospect of ICIs for cervical cancer from bench to bed.

Objective The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of different bone cement distributions along the fracture line on clinical and imaging outcomes of vertebral augmentation. Methods In total, 84 patients who underwent vertebral augmentation for a single osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture from January 2016 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups according to the relationship between the bone cement distribution and the fracture line: the unilateral group (n = 23) and the bilateral group (n = 61). Postoperative clinical and imaging parameters were compared between the two groups. Results Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in postoperative pain relief, bone cement leakage, nerve injury, or new vertebral fracture between the two groups. Significant recovery from vertebral compression was observed in the bilateral group after surgery, but there was no significant difference in vertebral compression after surgery in the unilateral group. Conclusions Pain relief was similar for different types of cement distributions along the fracture line, but a bilateral cement distribution exhibited better recovery from vertebral compression and did not increase bone cement leakage in the vertebral augmentation procedure.