Introduction Urogynaecological conditions have been shown to negatively impact on body image in a number of previous studies. ePAQ-Pelvic Floor (ePAQ-PF) is a patient reported outcome measure used in clinical practice to assess urogynaecological symptoms and their impact on quality-of-life. This study aimed to develop and undertake initial psychometric testing of a new domain to assess urogynaecological body image within ePAQ-PF. Methods A patient involvement group, analysis of free-text data from ePAQ-PF and a systematic review of available PROMs to assess urogynaecological body image informed the content of a new body image domain within ePAQ-PF. Data collected from 208 patients who consented to the use of their anonymised ePAQ-PF responses for research purposes underwent factor analysis, internal consistency reliability and item-total correlation testing. Data from previous studies were used to formulate hypotheses to test construct validity. Criterion validity was assessed against the Body-image Scale (BIS). Patients completed a separate questionnaire (QQ-11) to measure face validity of ePAQ-PF. Results Factor analysis revealed a 4-item body-image domain with good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α=0.899) and item-total correlations (Spearman's rank r >0.40). ePAQ-PF body-image domain scores correlated significantly with the BIS scores (r=0.501). Age, prolapse, sexual dysfunction, pelvic pain and urinary incontinence scores correlated significantly with body image domain score. QQ-11 value scores outweighed burden scores. Conclusions Body image assessment should form part of routine care in urogynaecology. Preliminary results support validity, reliability and functionality of ePAQ-PF incorporating the new body image domain. Further psychometric testing of this is required, including tests of responsiveness and stability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.