This Bayesian model demonstrated a superiority of CTA when compared to V/Q scan for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Low-risk patients are recognized to have a superior overall comparative gain favoring CTA.
Evidence regarding opinions on integrative modalities by patients and physicians is lacking. Methods. A survey study was conducted assessing how integrative modalities were valued among hematology/oncology patients and hematologists and oncologists at a major tertiary medical center. Results. 1008 patients and 55 physicians were surveyed. With the exception of support groups, patients valued nutrition services, exercise therapy, spiritual/religious counseling, supplement/herbal advice, support groups, music therapy, and other complimentary medicine services significantly more than physicians (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion. With the exception of support groups, patients value integrative modalities more than physicians. Perhaps with increasing education, awareness, and acceptance by providers and traditional institutions, integrative modalities could be equally valued between patients and providers. It is possible that increased availability and utilization of integrative oncology modalities at tertiary hospital sites could improve patient satisfaction, quality of life, and other clinical endpoints.
Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disorder with variable expressivity. We present a 62-year-old patient with a rare, late-onset disease course featuring a novel mutation in ACVRL1, a signal transducer in the TGFβ/BMP pathway.
Background:Disasters burden on hospital emergency intensive care units (ICUs). This burden is increased in Latin America (LATAM) where hospital resources, intrahospital disaster simulations, and perceived level of preparedness vary greatly among different communities. The objective of the study was to assess LATAM ICU leaders' knowledge and attitudes regarding disaster preparedness.Methods:We developed a ten-item, web-based knowledge and attitude survey administered via LATAM ICU leaders online forums. Descriptive statistics were used. Epi Info™ software was used for analysis. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test with P < 0.05 were implemented for statistical significance, and odds ratio was used to measure the strength of association among variables.Results:There were 68 respondents in the survey. 13/68 respondents felt prepared for disasters. 16/68 worked at hospitals with 250+ beds and 52/68 represented hospitals with <250 beds. 23/68 participated in hospital committees for disaster, 24/68 participated in simulations or drills, and 22/68 participated in trainings or courses for disasters. Feeling prepared for disasters did not correlate with hospital size (odds ratio [OR] = 2.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–9.92], P = 0.91), participation in hospital committees for disaster (OR = 3.10 [95% CI: 1.02–9.26], P = 0.08), and participation in simulations or drills (OR = 2.78 [95% CI: 0.93–8.29], P = 0.11), but participation in disaster trainings and courses appeared to directly correlate with the perception of being prepared (OR = 3.43 [95% CI: 1.13–10.41], P = 0.03).Conclusion:Among the 68 centers represented, the majority did not feel their institution to be adequately prepared for disasters, but training appeared to change that perception. A small sample size represents the major limitation of this study.
125 Background: Few studies have been reported in oncology regarding elements of physician agenda. We aim to compare elements of a doctor office visit agenda between hem/onc physicians (MD) and patients (pts). Methods: Pts and MDs were enrolled to completed a five question survey. Pts were asked: “My doctor” Focuses more on quantity of life and less on quality of life, spends enough time with me, addresses symptoms, addresses chemo side effects, and addresses prognosis. MDs were asked the same questions but worded: "I” spend enough time with pts for example. Answers were recorded on a 5 point scale (1 = highly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree,5 = highly agree) and converted into 2 categories (1,2,3 = neutral/disagree vs 4,5 = agree). Fisher’s exact test with 2 sided p-value was used to compare significance between MD & pts. Results: 1008 pts and 55 MDs were enrolled between 06/2013 - 10/2015. Pt mean age 55 (18-88) with 45% male and 55% female. Racial profile: 16% white, 14% black, 2% Asian/Pacific Islander. Ethnicity: 62% of pts were Hispanic vs. 38% not Hispanic, & 6% other. A significant number of pts feel MDs focus more on quantity of life vs. quality of life (64% pt vs 26% MD p < 0.0001) and MD spend enough time (94% pt vs 82% MD p < 0.05). No differences were seen for symptoms (92% vs 87% p = 0.2), side effects (92% vs 94% p = 1.0), or prognosis (91% vs 96% p = 0.3) pt vs MD respesctively. Conclusions: Pts feel MDs focus more on quantity of life vs. the quality of life. MDs feel they focus more on quality of life vs. quantity of life. Perhaps bridging the gap in what constitutes “quality of life” may improve patient satisfaction. Furthermore MDs underestimate the time spent with their patients. Perhaps MD are spending too much time with some patients resulting in inefficient office visits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.