Background: Pediatric spinal deformity surgeries are challenging operations that require considerable expertise and resources. The unique anatomy and rarity of these cases present challenges in surgical training and preparation. We present a case series illustrating how 3-dimensional (3-D) printed models were used in preoperative planning for 3 cases of pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Case Series: Patient 1 was a 6-year-old male with scoliosis secondary to an L3 hemivertebra and severe congenital heart disease who underwent excision of the L3 hemivertebra and L2-L4 spinal fusion. Patient 2 was an 11-year-old male with an L2 hemivertebra and lumbar kyphosis who underwent excision of the L2 hemivertebra and T12-L4 spinal fusion. Patient 3 was a 6-year-old female with Down syndrome who presented with atlantoaxial instability and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. She underwent occipitalcervical spinal fusion and decompression. Prior to surgery, 3-D printed models of the patients' spines were created based on computed tomography (CT) imaging. Conclusion: The anatomic complexity and risk of devastating neurologic consequences in spine surgery call for careful preparations. 3-D models enable more efficient and precise surgical planning compared to the use of 2-dimensional CT/magnetic resonance images. The 3-D models also make it easier to visualize patient anatomy, allowing patients and their families who lack medical training to interpret and understand cross-sectional anatomy, which in our experience, enhanced the consultations.

Objectives/Hypothesis: Children who do not require oxygen beyond 3 hours after surgery and pass a sleep room air challenge (SRAC) are safe for discharge regardless of polysomnogram (PSG) results or comorbidities.Study Design: Cross-sectional prospective study. Methods: All children observed overnight undergoing an adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing were prospectively recruited. Demographic, clinical, and PSG characteristics were stratified by whether the patient had required oxygen beyond 3 hours postoperatively (prolonged oxygen requirement [POR]) and compared using t test, chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test depending on distribution. Optimal cut points for predicting POR postsurgery were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The primary analysis was performed on the full cohort via logistic regression using POR as the outcome. Significant characteristics were analyzed in a logistic regression model, with significance set at P < .05.Results: A total of 484 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.65 (standard deviation = 4.02) years. Overall, 365 (75%) did not have a POR or any other adverse respiratory event. In multivariable logistic regression, risk factors for POR were an asthma diagnosis (P < .001) and an awake SpO 2 <96% (P = .005). The probability of a POR for those without asthma and a SpO 2 ≥ 96% was 18% (95% confidence interval: 14-22). Age, obesity, and obstructive apnea/hypopnea index were not associated with POR.Conclusions: In conclusion, all children in our study who are off oxygen within 3 hours of surgery and passed a SRAC were safe for discharge from a respiratory standpoint regardless of age, obesity status, asthma diagnosis, and obstructive apnea/hypopnea index. Additional investigations are necessary to confirm our findings.

Study Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if positional therapy is a viable treatment alternative for obese children with persistent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of children who underwent an adenotonsillectomy for OSA from 2014 to 2017. Children were included if they had a body mass index ≥ 95th percentile and underwent a postoperative polysomnogram. Subjects fell into one of three categories: mixed sleep (the presence of ≥ 30 minutes of both nonsupine and supine sleep), nonsupine sleep, and supine sleep. Cure was defined as an OSA/apnea-hypopnea index of < 1 events/h. Paired t tests were used to assess the differences, and a linear model adjusting for obesity class, age at procedure, and sex was performed to assess the differences between nonsupine and supine sleep. Results: There were 154 children who met the inclusion criteria. Using a paired t test, supine sleep position had a significantly higher average OSA/apneahypopnea index (7.9 events) compared with nonsupine (OSA/apnea-hypopnea index of 4.1); P value was < .01 for the 60 children with mixed sleep. Forty-three children had predominantly nonsupine sleep and 33 predominantly supine sleep, and a McNemar's test comparing these children showed that those sleeping in the nonsupine position were significantly more likely to be cured than those in the supine position (P < .001). Conclusions: Sleep physicians and otolaryngologists should be cognizant of positional treatment when consulting with families and note that the postoperative polysomnography may be inaccurate if it does not include supine sleep. Positional therapy as a potential treatment option for obese children with persistent OSA after adenotonsillectomy warrants further investigation.