SummaryPurposeIndian health care system comprising of public and private sectors needs enhancement of medical leadership capacity to face the growing challenges. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate medical leadership competencies of public and private sector doctors.FindingsA survey questionnaire was developed to assess “self‐assessed proficiency levels” as well as “perceived importance of competency levels,” to which 532 doctors responded—290 (54.5%) from private sector and 242 (45.5%) from public sector hospitals. Statistically significant “leadership competency gap” was observed for all 30 leadership competencies in both sectors, more so in public sector. The 10 most deficient competencies were mainly in the NHS‐MLCF domains of “working with others,” “managing services,” and “setting direction.” The most low‐rated competency among public sector doctors was “knowledge of HR, procurement, financial, and contract management” while “ability to influence key decision makers who determine future government policies” was most deficient among private sector physicians. Further, deficiencies related to “time and stress management” and “conducting need analysis, identifying and prioritizing requirements” were confined to public and private sector doctors, respectively.ConclusionsThis study, first from India, highlights a critical need for medical leadership development programs in both sectors for enhancement of medical leadership capacity in the country.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of leadership development programme on enhancing leadership competencies of physicians in India. Assessment of leadership competencies of physicians is critical for designing suitable leadership development programmes. The previous studies of authors have revealed significant gaps in leadership competencies among physicians in India. Hence, authors have designed a programme incorporating various facets of health-care leadership and evaluated its impact on improvement of leadership competencies of top- and mid-career level professionals.
Design/methodology/approach
A six-day offsite residential programme incorporating a three-day component of leadership development was organized, in which 96 physicians participated. A mix of pedagogical approaches was used. A pre- and post-assessment of 30 medical leadership competencies was done using a self-administered questionnaire.
Findings
Majority of participants (69%) scored their competencies at Level 3 and Level 4 (Average to Good) with a mean score ranging from 3.20 ± 0.85 to 4.12 ± 0.71 in the pre-assessment group. In contrast, in post-assessment, this shifted to Level 4 and Level 5 (Good to Very good) in 72% with mean scores ranging from 3.8 to 4.24. Statistically significant differentiation was noted in pre- and post-assessment mean scores for all 30 competencies. The maximum improvement was noted in Competency 29 “Information management system planning and implementation”, whereas the least improvement was noted in Competency 12 “Holding self and others accountable and responsible for organizational goal attainment”.
Originality/value
The authors believe that this is the first study from India to assess effectiveness of leadership development programmes on enhancing medical leadership competencies demonstrating positive outcome. The findings of this study can provide a roadmap for designing of future medical leadership development programmes for physicians in India.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.