Bilateral acetabular fractures following epileptic seizures are a rare but known occurrence in adults, with an 18.5% mortality rate. These fractures occurring post epileptic seizures have not been previously documented in children. We report a case of a 13-year-old boy who presented to hospital via ambulance following two violent generalised tonic–clonic seizures in a postictal state, metabolically acidotic and a low haemoglobin. Acute abdomen was suspected and the patient underwent a CT scan which showed bilateral acetabular fractures with central dislocations of both femoral heads and free fluid in the abdomen. The patient underwent initial damage control intervention with insertion of bilateral distal femur skeletal traction. Definitive fixation of the acetabular fractures occurred 1 week later with an open reduction internal fixation with novel supra-pectineal plates using a Pfannenstiel incision. We use this report to increase awareness of significant pelvic injuries in paediatric patients post epileptic seizures.
Ultrasound has been described as the “stethoscope” of the radiologist; its ability to aid in clinical diagnosis with both static and dynamic imaging has allowed fast and accurate diagnosis. However, traditionally unlike a stethoscope, a large and bulky ultrasound machine made it difficult to use portably in a hospital environment where patients can be scattered across a hospital. With the development of innovative ultrasound technology, Point of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) can readily be carried by a clinician to make a quick and timely diagnosis. In this review article we look at the uses of PoCUS within orthopaedic emergencies. Diagnosis in orthopaedics often requires further imaging beyond history taking, clinical examination and plain radiographs. In these cases PoCUS can be useful for ruling out occult fractures, diagnosing joint effusions and tendon ruptures. By aiding a speedy diagnosis, we can reduce unnecessary immobilisation, reduce inpatient stays, introduce early mobilisation and reduce harm to patients. With PoCUS becoming increasingly cheaper and more portable we feel this really can become the stethoscope of an orthopaedic surgeon.
Aim The use of intramedullary nail fixation remains the operation of choice for managing unstable and displaced tibia diaphyseal fractures. The literature shows that although commonly performed, there is not a standard approach when performing intramedullary nailing of the tibia; it could be hypothesised that this lack of standardisation may be contributing to the noted complications. This systematic review will look into intramedullary nailing of the tibia in all its parts, from identification of patients through to the surgical procedure techniques and finally the intra- and post-operative complications. Method Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Search terms included “tibial intramedullary nail” OR “tibial intramedullary rod” OR “tibial IM nail” OR “tibial interlock” AND “malrotation”, and “tibial intramedullary nailing” OR “tibial im nail” OR “tibial interlock” OR “tibial rod” AND “malrotation”. Results Eleven studies were considered in the final analysis, with a total number of 425 fractures (n=429, mean ± 95% CI=39 (21.2–56.8)). All included patients were treated with tibial intramedullary nail devices, and 110 showed some degree of malrotation postoperatively (n=110, mean ± 95% CI=10.1 (4.26–15.9)). Expressed as a percentage, a mean of 34.1% of patients had malrotation (mean ± 95% CI: 34.1 (15.8–52)). Conclusions This systematic review revealed there are gaps in the literature and in the management process of these patients and suggested that a systematic approach using ‘Get It Right First Time’ (GIRFT), intraoperative assessment, validated assessment tools, and imaging postoperatively should be used to improve outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.